Hi Yasuo, It may be to late for 7.0. Also Alexander liked to to add another proposal, but I saw only pre-required one(s) Anyway, it's not a big problem to vote now. I may take care about implementation for https://wiki.php.net/rfc/dbc2 (but only if it wins).
Thanks. Dmitry. On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohg...@ohgaki.net> wrote: > Hi all, > > I made vote only RFC and started discussion for voting > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/introduce_design_by_contract > Please feel free to correct/improve it. > > I added note to our RFCs > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/dbc > --- > This RFC is part of “Design by Contract Introduction” RFC > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/introduce_design_by_contract > There is alternative implementation proposal by “Definition” > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/dbc2 > ---- > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/dbc2 > ---- > This RFC is part of “Design by Contract Introduction” RFC > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/introduce_design_by_contract > This RFC is an alternative approach to “Native DbC support” RFC. > > http://wiki.php.net/rfc/dbc > ---- > > I understand there are things to resolve, but RFCs are good enough to > start discussions. I'll post discussion mail shortly. If you find anything, > have any comments or any show stopper, please let me know. > > Thank you! > > -- > Yasuo Ohgaki > yohg...@ohgaki.net > >
