Hi, 2015-03-07 8:28 GMT-03:00 Robert Stoll <p...@tutteli.ch>:
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Patrick Schaaf [mailto:p...@bof.de] > > Gesendet: Samstag, 7. März 2015 08:22 > > An: Philip Sturgeon > > Cc: internals; Robert Stoll > > Betreff: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Anonymous Classes > > > > Am 06.03.2015 20:14 schrieb "Philip Sturgeon" <pjsturg...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > Right, this here RFC has been drastically improved. > > > > > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/anonymous_classes > > > > > > Anyone got any doubts or troubles at this point? > > > > Can we / could we do "extends self", "extends static", or even "extends > $someclassname" ? > > > > The first two could be handy in factory like object methods, and the > last one generally in factory methods. > > > > best regards > > Patrick > > Personally, I would go step by step. First introduce anonymous classes and > then extend it with features like the one described above - should be less > controversial. > The last construct idea described by you would introduce dynamic > inheritance to a certain degree and I am not so sure if that is really a > good idea > > Cheers, > Robert > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > That's not controversial, it seems like a basic feature we should have. As anonymous classes is a major feature, adding "extends self" and "extends static" at a later stage would only cause portability issues between different versions of PHP7. If we are going to have this, better add it now. +1 Cheers, Márcio
