Hey: On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Peter Cowburn <petercowb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 March 2015 at 01:40, Wei Dai <zxcvda...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi internals, >> >> The RFC to add a user-land function for an easy-to-use and reliable >> preg_replace_callback_array() in PHP is up for discussion: >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/preg_replace_callback_array >> >> This proposes adding one function: `preg_replace_callback_array()` that >> is the better way to Implement when there are multiple patterns need to >> replace. >> >> I would love to hear your feedback! :) >> > > Could you add a paragraph or two explaining the reasons for choosing this > particular proposal? > Some examples of what I would like to read: > - why we can't do preg_replace_callback($array_of_regexes, > $array_of_callbacks, $subject) array() also could be a valid callback.. (array("clasname", "methodname")). > - why not preg_replace_callback($array_of_regex_to_callback_pairs, > $subject) there are also $limit, $count argument could be used. > - why not pass the regex used to the callback, as per Laruence's earlier > RFC bc break..(change the callback's signature) > > And give a few links to historical discussions in the same sort of area? > E.g Laruence's RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/second_arg_to_preg_callback and > its discussion thread (http://php.markmail.org/thread/qwiyq5o2vwlbdczq). > thanks > > > >> Any objections? >> >> >> — >> Best, >> Wei Dai >> >>
-- Xinchen Hui @Laruence http://www.laruence.com/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
