On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Michael Wallner <m...@php.net> wrote: > On 16/07/15 11:26, Rowan Collins wrote: >> Benjamin Eberlei wrote on 15/07/2015 21:19: >>> >>> But instanceof and anything related to Reflection or get_class or >>> relevant code will fail on array. >> >> >> Ah, yes, I hadn't thought of reflection type things. I don't think >> instanceof would be a problem, because checking for any class or >> interface other than Traversable would correctly return false; not sure >> if it would make sense for "array() instanceof Traversable" to return >> true or not... >> > > Maybe some pseudotype like callable (e.g. iteratable) makes more sense then?
People have talked about creating types like so: type Iterable = array | Traversable; which could then be used as normal: function foo(Iterable $f); I understand that this is the second feature I have mentioned in this train of thought that has not yet be officially proposed, but I think it's relevant. Why special case a pseudo-type if we can have a generic way of making them in user-land? -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
