Hi Scott, On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Scott Arciszewski <sc...@paragonie.com> wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2015 2:27 PM, "Niklas Keller" <m...@kelunik.com> wrote: > > I prefer Exception, too, because it's I/O related. > > > > @Scott: You can open votes on everything, doesn't matter, just create a > page with a vote. > > I just don't know where to put it in the wiki, because it's not a RFC. > > > > Regards, Niklas > > I'm not sure how to do that. > > I have a noncritical security patch I intend to write for random_bytes() > that I would like to submit as a PR but first I'd like to see what the > resolution will be re: Exceptions. > > Also, merge conflicts aren't fun. ;) > > If there's anything I can do to get those two merged faster, please let me > know. You can have RFC vote options like - Raise Error/Exception when CSPRNG is not available (Choice: Yes/No) - Use error(E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR) or exception(Whatever exception prefered) (Choice: Error/Exception) BTW, I prefer exception, but consistency is important also. My vote will be Yes and Error. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net
