On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Bishop Bettini <bis...@php.net> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Andreas Heigl <andr...@heigl.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Am 05.11.15 um 14:14 schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
>> > [...]
>> > > I would keep the old behavior for 5.6, even if that was unintended
>> nobody
>> > > complained about it(so removing it isn't a bugfix per se), so I see no
>> > > reason to break userland code working before in a micro version.
>> > > for PHP-7.0 we can remove the old undocumented behavior but drop a
>> > mention
>> > > in NEWS/upgrading.
>> > >
>> > As it's already broken in the last 3 micro-versions I'm not sure whether
>> > it makes things more complicated to "re-enable" it or not.
>> >
>> > Personally I'd say leave it as it is now (and try to prohibit such
>> > things in future).
>> >
>> 5.6 is not even halfway until EOL, so I think that argument of keeping the
>> BC break because there are already 3 micro versions affected it is a bit
>> weak:
>> http://php.net/supported-versions.php
>
>
> Some are vendor-pinned and can't get the upgrade, so they have to fix
> their code anyway.  Those who can upgrade would have to fix their code by
> 7.0, and IMO it seems better to fix it now while its on their mind.
>
> We're talking about a very small surface area of affected code, one that
> is easily changed with a sed. The damage of "breaking the behavior" is
> already done. Fixing user code or upgrading the engine is the only
> resolution. To me, fixing user code is the best solution: it's long term
> necessary, it's short term easy.  If this were breaking documented code (as
> happened with array_unique in 5.2.9), then I'd say fix the engine. But it's
> not, it's breaking undocumented side-effected user code.  That to me sounds
> like a user code fix.
>

and some will be pinned to the version before the BC break, some after the
possible fix, some will backport this fix anyways when their users complain.

-- 
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

Reply via email to