You're right! Good call :) On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:05 PM Sara Golemon <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Colin O'Dell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Would your proposal also allow !==== to work? > > > I think you means !===, which is "not-identical assignment" (!== =) > > !==== is just *CRAZY TALK* > > -Sara >
