On 6/3/2016 3:40 PM, Theodore Brown wrote: > I am also in favor of the proposal to replace ?QuestionMarkNullables > with union|null. Having a single way to declare nullable types will > keep the reflection API simpler, make things easier for static > analysis tools, and prevent developers from having to wonder which > syntax they should use for a given function. This would be a big win > for language consistency, and this is probably our only chance to > make the change without breaking BC. >
I am actually only in favor of disallowing ?T1|T2 in favor of T1|T2|null but not ?T because it's shorter and I do not see a problem with that. -- Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
