On Saturday, July 2, 2016, Aaron Piotrowski <aa...@trowski.com> wrote: > > > There was no discussion on the list of allowing stdClass, but I did discuss > it with some people in chat. Our consensus was that a casting to an array > was a reasonable and simple requirement to allow an instance of stdClass to > be iterable. >
Sounds good to me. Happy to hear it was discussed. Thanks! -- jeremy mikola
