Niklas Keller wrote:
> I don't think it does require a RFC, it's not a language change. Let's see
> if anyone opposes first.

I agree to, if the internals agree, I guess that RFC is needless.


Niklas Keller wrote:
> I'm not sure on the boolean through, I think a new function might be better.

In this point I desagree.
I think that boolean is the best way, mainly to avoid a new function
on userland.
It's like an "extension" for gettype(), and make senses just extend it.


2016-07-29 11:21 GMT-03:00 Niklas Keller <m...@kelunik.com>:
> 2016-07-29 16:03 GMT+02:00 Ryan Pallas <derokor...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I love this idea (as I've written much the same code before), I do think it
>> will require a full RFC though.
>>
>
> I don't think it does require a RFC, it's not a language change. Let's see
> if anyone opposes first.
>
> I'm not sure on the boolean through, I think a new function might be better.
>
> It's something that can be implemented in userland, but it's also something
> that's really often needed.
>
> Regards, Niklas



-- 
David Rodrigues

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to