2017-05-17 19:12 GMT+02:00 Dan Ackroyd <dan...@basereality.com>: > > We were thinking about enumerations > > Who do you mean 'we', kemosabe? >
My apologies. I was a little hurry. > > > Especially when taking Java pattern > > Java has been limited in its design as almost everything had to be an > object, whether or not it was a good fit for what was needed. > > For me, objects are good at storing state, hiding implementation > details and allowing type substitution.....pretty much none of those > things apply to enums, and so make me think that forcing enums to be > objects isn't always the right thing to do. > > cheers > Dan > -- regards / pozdrawiam, -- Michał Brzuchalski about.me/brzuchal brzuchalski.com
