On 26.05.2017 at 12:16, Niklas Keller wrote: > 2017-05-26 10:35 GMT+02:00 Andrey Andreev <n...@devilix.net>: > >> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Dan Ackroyd <dan...@basereality.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> The RFC specifically didn't mention LSP....because that is separate >>> from co/contravariance. It's unfortunate for other people to be >>> throwing the two around at you with a lack of precision. >> >> Perhaps this was the issue ... I was under the impression that LSP was >> used as (part of) the motivation for the RFC. >> >> The rest is pretty clear, though thanks for the lengthy explanation. :) > > Sorry for the delay and confusion. As Nikita already mentioned, it's a > consequence of LSP, not directly what LSP is about.
Indeed, it is not about LSP, so I suggest to fix the note in UPGRADING[1]. [1] <https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/e5c273dc0ea4cb0e0583af9b4c5889a8c431264f/UPGRADING#L100-L103> -- Christoph M. Becker -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
