Hi, On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:00 AM, Pedro Magalhães <m...@pmmaga.net> wrote: > > With this being said, would anyone oppose an implementation where all the > options (including lifetime) are included in the array parameter? >
Yes. All other "options" are actual *cookie attribute* names, as defined by the various IETF RFCs, while "lifetime" is just a convenient name used by PHP. It doesn't correspond to a particular attribute, but instead the values for the Expires and Max-Age attributes are derived from it. I believe during discussion I insisted that the parameter be called "attributes", for this very reason. On another note, I also wanted that pretty much any key/value pair to be accepted instead of raising an error, for forward compatibility. Unfortunately, neither of these 2 points I raised were addressed, but it also looked like the author abandoned the RFC mid-vote as he agreed that targeting 7.2 at the time wasn't a good idea, only he didn't actually close the vote. So ... I'm not even sure of the status of this RFC? Cheers, Andrey. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
