Insofar as conversation started what do you think about CI service that supports big endian platform?On Feb 2, 2019 15:09, "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecke...@gmx.de> wrote: > > On 02.02.2019 at 14:31, Nikita Popov wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 2:06 PM Christoph M. Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de> > > wrote: > > > >> On 02.02.2019 at 13:18, Nikita Popov wrote: > >> > >>> I just learned about the Azure Pipelines ( > >>> https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/devops/pipelines/) offering, > >>> which offers open source projects 10 parallel builds with unlimited > >>> minutes. Assuming there's no other catch here, it might be worthwhile to > >>> migrate our Windows CI jobs to Azure Pipelines. > >> > >> An alternative to consider is using Travis for Windows CI[1], too. > > > > It's an option, but I think we're generally better off using multiple CI > > platforms to increase the number of parallel builds we get. > > > > Next to the builds we already have, I think it would be very good to also > > have a macos builder (this is supported by both Travis and Azure Pipelines, > > but needs someone familiar with the platform to set things up) and a 32-bit > > builder (probably a -m32 build on x86_64 Linux). That would bring us to a > > total of six builds, which would probably make the Travis queue somewhat > > slow if we used it exclusively. > > Ah, makes perfect sense (a FreeBSD CI would be nice as well). > > Regarding the execution time of the test suite, it might be sensible to > also have a look at PR #2822[1] and/or PFTT2[2]. > > [1] <https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/2822> > [2] <https://git.php.net/?p=pftt2.git> > > -- > Christoph M. Becker > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >
