> On Mar 13, 2019, at 15:56, Rowan Collins <rowan.coll...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I suggest you both read the RFC; about half the page is dedicated to > summarising the syntaxes which have been considered, and the pros and cons of > each. > > The summary of that syntax begins: > > > This is both the most popular and the most technically infeasible syntax.
I did read the RFC, and I could find no mention of f(), so I’ll rephrase my question. :-) I would like to consider `f` as a potential leading symbol instead of `fn`. Cheers, Ben
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP