Hi,
it's nice to see this going on again :)
while reading the rfc I was wondering, why do we need the "static" keyword,
couldn't static function be detected automatically ?
I guess this apply to the existing closure syntax as well so to get more on
this topic I'll share my preferences on the syntax: I like the ==> or ~>
version because it also allow to drop the parenthesis when there is only one
argument and it's closer to what I'm used to in javascript
I wouldn't mind having the rust syntax too but yeah, it would feel a bit odd in
PHP
thank you for your work on this !
Nikita Popov – Wed, 13. March 2019 16:57
> Hi internals,
>
> Motivated by the recent list comprehensions RFC, I think it's time we took
> another look at short closures:
>
> wiki.php.net/rfc/arrow_functions_v2
>
> This is based on a previous (withdrawn) proposal by Levi & Bob. It uses the
> syntax
>
> fn($x) => $x * $multiplier
>
> and implicit by-value variable binding. This example is roughly equivalent
> to:
>
> function($x) use($multiplier) { return $x * $multiplier; }
>
> The RFC contains a detailed discussion of syntax choices and binding modes.
>
> Regards,
> Nikita
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
