> Le 5 avr. 2019 à 09:45, Stijn Peeters <i...@stijnpeeters.nl> a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> If I understand correctly it is possible in this proposal to use normal
> arguments after using an unpackable argument:
>
> $arr4 = array(...$arr1, ...$arr2, 111); //valid
>
> This is something that is not possible when using argument unpacking in
> function calls:
>
> $result = someFunction(...$arr1, ...$arr2, 111); //invalid
>
> While I personally like the more permissive variety in this RFC, I think this
> could be a confusing inconsistency, and for clarity's sake it would be better
> to keep both instances of the unpacking syntax as consistent with each other
> as possible.
>
> Best,
> Stijn
>
>
That begs the question: why is this invalid for function calls?
In fact, I am able to easily hack around the limitation:
$result = someFunction(...$arr1, ...$arr2, ...[111]); // valid
but the limitation seems just an unnecessary annoyance.
—Claude
