wt., 23 kwi 2019 o 11:17 Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> ... > Without commenting on the rest of the proposal: It's not possible to use > (ClassName) as a cast syntax, because it is ambiguous. For example (Foo) > [$x] is already valid syntax (fetch constant Foo and take index $x), or > (Foo) +$bar, etc. > Wouldn't that be possible to differentiate consts with class names if we merge symbol tables and allow only one symbol with the same name? I know this is huge BC break but AFAIK in the past, there was a discussion about merging symbol tables. -- regards / pozdrawiam, -- Michał Brzuchalski about.me/brzuchal brzuchalski.com
