Hi Mike,
I am curious why your RFC uses "=" instead of "=>" for separating
> properties from values?
>
> If we used "=>" it is potential — with lookahead parsing — that the
> following could be unambiguous:
>
> { foo => 10 }
>
>
The reason about choosing "=" was a simplification of instantiation and
properties initialisation
and we use "=" to assign property values now.
The "=>" is specific for array key pairs and IMO should stay specific for
arrays only.Thanks, Michał Brzuchalski
