On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 5:18 PM Benjamin Eberlei <kont...@beberlei.de> wrote:
> We heard you repeating the RFC process isn't applicable very often now, but > a productive way forward needs to take it into account to make any change > in governance. > > For many of the current contributors RFC+Voting process is the only visible > process that was applied and has been used to make changes to the language > in the last 8 years. > > Even if it was not originally envisoned by you or Pierre to be usable for > deprecations or to amend itself, that is what is has been used for the last > few years. I correct this. I did not mention anything alike. Only that legal (not a lawyer but been there done that), I only listed two things that can definitely not be done via RFCs, at least not until the license and the assignment of this license is as it is now. For the rest, I tend to fully agree with the general feeling, I am totally fine to use the RFC to change itself, the language or whatever. The only thing I dislike a lot is the general tone of these discussions, that should be different, that makes me sad and really not willing to participate in any way. Best, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
