Call for Papers "Human Enhancement Technologies and Human Rights" Interdisciplinary Conference Stanford University Law School Stanford, CA (USA) 26-28 May 2006
Much of the criticism of enhancement technologies has focused on the potential for increased discrimination against women, people of color, the poor, the differently enabled, or "unenhanced" humans. Some bioethicists have proposed a global treaty to ban enhancement technologies as "crimes against humanity." Defenders of enhancement argue that the use of biotechnologies is a fundamental human right, inseparable from the defense of bodily autonomy, reproductive freedom, free expression and cognitive liberty. While acknowledging real risks from genetic, prosthetic, and cognitive enhancement, defenders of enhancement believe that bans on the consensual use of new technologies would be an even greater threat to human rights. Health care, disability and reproductive rights activists have argued that access to technology empowers full and equal participation in society. On the same grounds a generalized right to "technological empowerment" might connect defenders of enhancement technologies with disability activists, reproductive rights activists with would-be parents seeking fertility treatments, the transgendered with aesthetic body modifiers, drug policy reformers and anti-aging researchers with advocates for dignity in dying. Yet what, if any, limits should be considered to human enhancement? On what grounds can citizens be prevented from modifying their own genes or brains? How far should reproductive rights be extended? Might enhancement reduce the diversity of humanity in the name of optimal health? Or, conversely, might enhancements inspire such an unprecedented diversity of human beings that they strain the limits of liberal tolerance and social solidarity? Can we exercise full freedom of thought if we can't exercise control over our own brains using safe, available technologies? Can we ensure that enhancement technologies are safe and equitably distributed? When are regulatory efforts simply covert, illiberal value judgments? Between the ideological extremes of absolute prohibition and total lassez-faire that dominate popular discussions of human enhancement there are many competing agendas, hopes and fears. How can the language of human rights guide us in framing the critical issues? How will enhancement technologies transform the demands we make of human rights? With the Human Enhancement and Human Rights conference we seek to begin a conversation with the human rights community, bioethicists, legal scholars, and political activists about the relationship of enhancement technologies to human rights, cognitive liberty and bodily autonomy. It is time to begin the defense of human rights in the era of human enhancement. Examples of topics that might be addressed: Day One: Human Enhancement and Control of the Body - How much morphological diversity can a polity sustain? - Animal-human chimeric enhancement and animal rights - Reproductive cloning: Irrelevant, futile or an important battle? - Disability rights and cyborg assistive technology - Life extension and the right to die: Two sides of the same coin? - Germline engineering and the consent of future generations - Procreative liberty and the genetic enhancement of children - The medicalization of transgenderism - Cosmetic surgery and future body modification Day Two: Cognitive Enhancement Technology For instance, papers might address: - Enhancing capacities for citizenship - Social equality and cognitive enhancement - Freedom of thought as a basis for rights to use cognitive enhancement - Pychoactive drug law reform - Religious liberty and entheogens - Regulating the risks of neural implants and brain machines - The myth of the "authentic self" - Challenges to human personhood and citizenship from cognitive enhancement - Use of technologies of personality modification in criminal rehabilitation Instructions for Submitting Presentations Include all of the following information in a two-page proposal for your presentation: - Title of presentation - Type of presentation: paper, panel, poster, workshop - Abstract (25-100 words) for inclusion in the conference program - Media to be used and audiovisual equipment needed (if any). - Designated contact person (only one per proposal) - Complete name, title, organization, address, phone and fax numbers, and e-mail address for each session presenter - Brief biographical sketch of each presenter Please submit your proposal electronically by January 1, 2006 to the conference chair James Hughes at <[email protected]>. The presenters of accepted proposals will need to pre-register for the conference by April 15, 2006 at the reduced rate of $100 in order to be included in the program. Timeline for Presenters Proposals due by: January 1, 2006 Notification of acceptance: March 1, 2006 Deadline for pre-registration by presenters: April 15, 2006 Contact: James Hughes Ph.D. Conference Chair Public Policy Studies Trinity College Williams 229B 300 Summit St. Hartford, CT 06106 USA Phone: +1 (860) 297-2376 Email: [email protected] _________________________________ InterPhil List Administration: http://interphil.polylog.org/ Intercultural Philosophy Calendar: http://agd.polylog.org/cal/
