__________________________________________________

Call for Papers

"Philosophy as Therapeia: Perspectives from India and
Europe"
2008 Symposium
Royal Institute of Philosophy, University of Liverpool
Liverpool (UK)
19-21 June 2008

__________________________________________________


We are inviting proposals for papers on the topics outlined
below. Please send abstracts to Clare Carlisle
<[email protected]> by 30th September 2007.

Papers presented at the Symposium will be published by
Cambridge University Press in a volume entitled Philosophy
as Therapeia.

"Empty are the words of that philosopher who offers therapy
for no human suffering. For just as there is no use in
medical expertise if it does not give therapy for bodily
diseases, so too there is no use in philosophy if it does
not expel the suffering of the soul." The Stoic Epicurus
(341-271 BCE) was not the only philosopher to give voice to
a conception of philosophy as a cure or remedy for the
maladies of the human soul. Indeed, this has been a
prominent theme throughout the history of philosophy in
Europe, and it has been just as prominent in many of the
various traditions of philosophy in India.

The aim of this Royal Institute of Philosophy symposium is
to explore this paradigm or metaphor for the nature of
philosophical practice. Our intention is that the resulting
volume, to be published by Cambridge University Press, will
contain the most definitive statement to date of the scope
and limits of the medicinal model. There will be studies of
all the most important uses to which this model have been
put by philosophers in the past (Socratic, Stoics, Epicurus,
Sextus Empiricus; early Buddhists, Mahayana Buddhism;
Upanisadic, Nyaya, Epic; Kierkegaard, Spinoza, Wittgenstein,
Derrida), and also analyses of the model from contemporary
and comparative perspectives.

Some of the central themes this Symposium will discuss
include:

- What are the "illnesses" that afflict ourselves as
  subjects, to which philosophy might be cathartic?

- What is the content of the medical analogy? Is the
  medicine a curative, a tonic, or a prophylactic?

- Why do both Sextus Empiricus and the Buddha regard the
  medicine that is philosophy to be an emetic, purging
  itself as well as the disease?

- What is the role of the sage or wise person, for example
  Yajñavalkya in the Upanisads or the Stoic Sage?

- What is the relation between philosophy as treatment and
  'indirect communication' (Kierkegaard)?


Contact:

Clare Carlisle, Ph.D
Department of Philosophy
University of Liverpool
7 Abercromby Square
Liverpool, L69 7WY
UK
Email: [email protected]

__________________________________________________

InterPhil List Administration:
http://interphil.polylog.org

Intercultural Philosophy Calendar:
http://cal.polylog.org

Reply via email to