__________________________________________________

Conference Announcement

"Assessing Territorial Pluralism"
Interdisciplinary Workshop
Ethnicity and Democratic Governance Project,
Queen's University
Kingston, ON (Canada)
16-17 May 2008

__________________________________________________


Territorial pluralism involves the accommodation of
territorially-concentrated ethnic, linguistic, religious,
and national communities, either in a pluralist federation,
a pluralist union state, a federacy, or through other
institutions that link cross-border territories. A pluralist
federation has internal boundaries that respect nationality,
ethnicity, language or religion. Fully pluralist federations
entail significant and constitutionally entrenched autonomy
for federative entities; consensual, indeed consociational,
rather than majoritarian decision making rules within the
central government; and plurinational recognition, i.e.
acknowledgement of plurinationalism in the state’s
constitution, or through its flags and symbols, as well as
collective, as opposed to partitioned, autonomy for the
relevant nationalities. Plurinational federations may also
entail asymmetrical federalism, with more extensive formal
or informal autonomy for federative units belonging to
distinct nationalities. In a pluralist union state, autonomy
is given to one or more historically recognized nationality,
but the autonomy is treated as a rescindable gift of the
central political institutions. While, in pluralist
federations, institutions of self-government exist across
the whole state, in union states, they are more likely to
exist only in one part of the state. When autonomous and
asymmetric institutions are entrenched, by way of the
constitution or by an international treaty, there exists a
federacy, namely a unit of government that enjoys a
distinctive federal relationship with the state. Finally,
cross-border territorial institutions, such as Ireland’s
‘North-South Ministerial Council’, accommodate national
communities that spill over state frontiers.

The concept of territorial pluralism is related to what
Watts and Elazar describe as ‘Federal Political Systems’,
but it is distinct in that it emphasizes the territorial
accommodation of ethnic, religious, linguistic and national
communities. Territorial pluralism raises a number of
important questions, and we hope to discuss at least three
of these in our conference. What is territorial pluralism
(i.e., what is the range of such institutional responses to
diversity?) and how can it be distinguished from forms of
self-government that do not accommodate communities based on
ethnicity, religion, language or nationality? Under what
conditions does territorial pluralism succeed or fail? Is
territorial pluralism a normatively appropriate response to
diversity?

Co-organizers:
John McGarry (Queen's University)
Richard Simeon (University of Toronto & Harvard)


Contact:

Jennifer Clark, Project Manager
Ethnicity and Democratic Governance Research Project
Department of Political Studies
Queen's University
Macintosh-Corry Hall, Room C423
Kingston, ON K7L 3N6
Canada
Phone: +1 (613) 533-6000 ext 74279
Fax:   +1 (613) 533-6848
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://www.queensu.ca/edg/workshops2008b.html

__________________________________________________

InterPhil List Administration:
http://interphil.polylog.org

Intercultural Philosophy Calendar:
http://cal.polylog.org

Reply via email to