__________________________________________________

Call for Papers

"Concerning Peace: Utopia or Pantopia?"
International Peace Workshop 2008
International Research Group Transcendental
Philosophy/German Idealism
arttransponder
Institut für Philosophie, Technische Universität Berlin
Berlin (Germany)
2-4 October 2008

__________________________________________________


Main concept

True peace, in the time of "global war zones" and
"home-grown terrorists", seems stranded in utopian fantasy.
War as a daily media phenomenon obscures our apprehension of
reality, truth, and appearance; political battle-fields have
come to seem so omnipresent that they escape our notice. But
the globalization that has since thoroughly entrenched
itself in our world – is there really no longer any external
refuge we can set our hopes on? – compels us to find
solutions to the problem of global peace. This means, first
of all, that we have to begin by clarifying the concept of
peace, by examining the conditions of its possibility. While
common sense treats peace in terms of realpolitik and
conceives it merely as the desirable but unstable political
opposite to warlike disputes and conflicts, there is urgent
need for richer and more differentiated conception of peace.
Just as health is not just the absence of sickness, peace
seems to be more than just the absence of war. This vacuum
in our conception of peace makes itself felt in the great
religious institutions and political ideologies that have
all lost any credible claim to a sustainable solution to the
prob-lem of peace. For these reasons, we seek to shed light
on the conditions and possibilities for the existence of
peace from different perspectives.

This three-day workshop aims to sound out new perspectives
on this question. Could it be that the purely positivistic
concepts of peace, as they are used in politics and everyday
life, in history, in psychology and sociology, are too
narrow and are unsuited for a full grasp of the complex
philosophical profundities of a systematic conception of
peace? Could it be that the original ground of the
distinction between war and peace is to be found deep within
the human con-sciousness, in its underlying morality? This
would be the case if the conditions of peace were pri-marily
located not in the visible world referenced by positivistic
scientific discourses, but in the prima facie invisible
realm of the logical conditions of rational life.

Following the collapse of the monopoly that churches and
ideologies had claimed on the re-alization of true peace, we
aim at a holistic perspective on the concept of peace within
the condi-tions of modernity, independent of religious
paradigms – a perspective that can present us with new
aspects, relations and questions about true peace. It seems
that as humans we cannot help but imagine peace as an
everlasting and omnipresent state, a pantopia, and hope and
strive for this. However, our finite globe does not seem to
be a very suitable place to realize this idea; thus this
conception quickly turns utopian, turns to unworkable
fantasy. What we are seeking are the conditions under which
we can think and live the idea of peace under the assumption
of this finitude; thus we consciously frame the concept of
peace between the extremes of utopia and panto-pia, between
the clear unreality of peace and its very concrete reality
that makes the utopian fan-tasy conceivable in the first
place. We are searching for means and methods, philosophical
and artistic, to provide both a theoretical and a practical
solution to this dilemma.

What is the place of peace in the arts and philosophy? Which
representations can be found for true peace between utopia
and pantopia? This conference aims to locate peace
philosophically and artistically between its real
possibility and its possible reality – and to sketch the
first drafts for a systematic topology of peace. Thus it is
the main purpose of this workshop to reflect on the
comprehensive structures of peace as they pertain to all
areas of life and in doing so to give new currency and
relevance to our understanding of the phenomenon of peace.
The workshop invites artists and philosophers to take the
concept of true peace as a point of departure in order to
conceive and realize peace as a stance and as a creative
act. The congress defines itself as explicitly
interdisciplinary and seeks above all to open a creative
dialogue between artists and philosophers.

Proposals for potential themes and sections

1. Utopia, fiction and perspective: the unreal possibility
and impossible reality of peace:
This module examines the relation between peace, fiction and
utopia. How could a new uto-pia be achieved? Can an
aesthetic presentation of peace still succeed today under
the condi-tions of modernity? We are looking for an
aesthetic of peace that dares to envision a new uto-pia and
creates robust fictions of true peace in a finite world, as
well as for philosophical approaches that shed light on the
meaning, structures and functions that utopias and fictions
have for the concept of peace.

2. Dystopia, perversion and corruption: a dead peace as real
impossibility:
This module examines the problematic relations between peace
and utopia. Human attempts to live together in peace have
always ended in catastrophes and perversions of the original
ideal. On the artistic side, we are calling for visions for
a dead peace, of peace as corruption of humanity and nature.
On the philosophical side, we are looking for analyses that
work out structures and criteria for peace as perversion.

3. Pantopia, omnipresence and modern metaphysics: the real
possibility of living peace:
Though peace is nowhere secure and nowhere guaranteed, true
peace seems to demand a kind of absolute certainty. Peace
remains the irreducible aim of humans. What makes us hold so
tightly to this apparently unrealistic goal? What sort of
reality can we find in this seemingly ineradicable hope? Are
there philosophical and artistic approaches that can move
beyond the fictional quality of peace in this finite world?
Could it be that the reality of peace is found in its pure
possibility – or could be found there? We are looking for
philosophical as well as aesthetic approaches showing how a
possibility could be more real than tangible reality. We are
in search of artists that practically implement the visions
of peace in their work, who put these visions into action
and who deal with the substantial omnipresence of the
possible as the reality of peace. We are looking for
philosophers who are working to analyze and legitimate the
complex realm of the possibility of peace.

Procedure

For this conference from October 2 - 4, 2008, we would ask
all those interested in participating to send us an abstract
of their contribution by April 20, 2008. The abstract should
be a short presen-tation of the lecture or of the artistic
contribution (i.e. an artist lecture, a performance, etc.)
cen-tered on one of the themes that we propose or on an idea
of the participant's own. It is our goal for the
philosophical side of the conference to present systematic
contributions that develop an original position in a way
that is understandable for non-philosophers. The artistic
participants are asked to offer contributions that are
accessible to a non-artistic public. During the congress in
October 2008, the participant will have 30 minutes to
present his or her contribution, after which a further 30
minutes are planned for an open and critical discussion with
the public. A publication of the contributions is planned.
The congress will be conducted in both English and German,
following the wishes of each participant.

Requirements

We plan to finance the project through fellowships. In order
to be able to produce a homogenous and thematically profiled
application, we need the following information from
interested partici-pants:
- a short abstract of the proposed presentation, no longer
  than 500 words, in English or in German
- a short CV, including relevant academic or artistic
  achievements
- a list of relevant publications or projects relating to
  the proposed abstract
- contact information including current address

All information must be sent before April 25, 2008 to:
Kai U. Gregor, [email protected]
or
Serguei Spetschinsky, [email protected]

Organization:
Dr. Christoph Asmuth, Kai U. Gregor and Serguei Spetschinsky



__________________________________________________

InterPhil List Administration:
http://interphil.polylog.org

Intercultural Philosophy Calendar:
http://cal.polylog.org

Reply via email to