__________________________________________________

Call for Papers

"Practices of Citizenship, Sustainability and Belonging"
ASA Annual Convention 2009
American Studies Association (ASA)
Washington, DC (USA)
5-8 November 2009

__________________________________________________


The 2009 ASA Program Committee invites colleagues in
American Studies and all related disciplines to submit
proposals for individual papers, entire sessions,
presentations, performances, films, roundtables, workshops,
conversations, or alternative formats described below on any
topic dealing with American cultures, including topics in
disciplines that have been under-represented in American
Studies research and teaching.

Proposals must be submitted through the ASA's online
submission system.
Deadline for submissions is January 26, 2009.

The theme for the 2009 ASA Annual Meeting, to be held in
Washington D.C., is "Practices of Citizenship,
Sustainability, and Belonging."

Questions of citizenship, belonging and sustainability have
for some time been at the heart of much Americans Studies
scholarship. Historically, categories of citizenship,
traditions of belonging, and concepts of sustainability have
been constructed and sustained through specific practices -
of state and society, individuals and communities. They have
been subject to profound redefinition, in response to
changing national and geopolitical realities. This has
always been so. But today, in a time of global and domestic
crises, practices of citizenship, sustainability, and
belonging demand reflection and debate informed by the ASA's
distinct mode of scholarly and civic engagement. Whatever
the outcome of the 2008 election, these themes are timely
and compelling particularly for the upcoming meeting to be
held in the nation's capitol. What better time and place to
pose these and related questions: What are the practices
that define us as citizens? What are the practices that have
sustained and can sustain human communities and the planet?
What are the practices that create a sense of belonging in
our lives? At the same time, we must ask about the practices
that delimit those communities. What costs are exacted by
specific constructions of belonging and citizenship? What is
sustained, and how is power enacted, in the rituals and
practices of individuals and institutions?

A robust tradition of work in American Studies has often
emphasized that citizenship is not given. Contrary to
conventional wisdom, citizenship is not an abstract
attribute, intrinsically available to all native-born and
naturalized American citizens. Rather, the issue of who is a
citizen, and thus able to claim, following Hannah Arendt,
"the right to have rights," has been a deeply contingent and
contested matter since the founding of the American nation.
In the past and present, the lived experience of citizenship
in practice, whether defined from above, by the state, or
from below, by persons and groups, has been understood as a
double-edged process of inclusion and exclusion. As such,
citizenship would seem to be enough for one ASA conference.
But in pairing the theme of citizenship with sustainability,
we acknowledge the growing interest the latter concept has
had in the field of American studies, and its increased
influence in national and international public discourse.
Notions of sustainability, also marked by debate and
contestation, have transformed the theory and practice of
citizenship for people in the United States, which in turn,
often has global consequences. Notions of sustainability
have informed the pursuit of ideas of health, security,
justice and well-being in the public arena, ranging from the
personal to the planetary, through myriad forms of civic
engagement, including the rise of the environmental justice
movement, consumer lifestyle choices and boycotts, movements
for nuclear disarmament, taxpayer revolts, public health
advocacy, HIV-AIDS activism, etc.

Our interest in sustainability, however, extends well beyond
the present moment. We believe this keyword can prompt
serious inquiry into questions of political economy and
citizenship in the past. For example, Thomas Jefferson could
only imagine a particular kind of sustainable political
economy, one that expanded democracy through increasing the
population of landowning white males. To him, this was
sustainable, but at what costs to others outside this
charmed circle? When have concerns about economic
sustainability precluded issues of social change, and when
have they been the catalyst for such change? The use of and
control over such natural resources as land, water, forests,
oil, coal, uranium and other minerals have profoundly shaped
national borders, citizenship boundaries and foreign
relations. At times, visions of expanded citizenship have
relied upon assumptions of economic expansion, while
struggles for the expansion of rights frequently have been
tied to national and international crises, including global
wars. We welcome explorations of these anxious
intersections, as well as studies that examine practices
that have sought to combine economic stability and
increasing equality. We envision a wide range of possible
projects, including a re-examination of some utopian
communities of the nineteenth century, as well as historical
and contemporary examinations of religious practices, social
movements, and cultural products. And we seek to encourage
ongoing research in all periods, including work by
Americanists in environmental studies and Native American
studies, scholars of public policy, urban studies, and the
social, natural, and behavioral sciences.

We propose the additional keyword, belonging, to invite
examinations of the practices by which communities are
formed-as sites of political engagement cultural production,
and social transformation, from the local to the global. The
concept of belonging enables projects that examine
formulations of nationalism, as well as those imagined
communities that function as alternatives to the modern
nation-state, or which simply exist alongside and across its
borders. The concept of belonging is crucial for the
conference theme because it invites work on religion, which
has been integral to the formation of communities, and on
media and technology, which have variously transformed the
conceptual possibilities and modalities through which
belonging is enacted. We welcome inquiry into the full range
of media, from the role of print and popular culture since
the early Republic, to the rise of "new media," including
cable television and the internet, in the construction of
new ways of belonging. The term also opens up questions
about the construction of family and gender, as well as
examinations of foreign policy, transnational organizations,
and globalization. As with the other keywords of the theme,
we envision the most expansive approach to issues of
belonging. That includes us, as American Studies scholars
and practitioners. The conference offers an opportunity to
consider the theoretical models that scholars in our
interdiscipline have drawn on to constitute our intellectual
communities, and to assess the success of those models in
bridging the many (and growing) subfields and disciplines
within American Studies. What models, what types of
questions, and which intellectual practices are appropriate
to an engaged American Studies that is interested in
furthering sustainable practices and states committed to
upholding human rights?

Our program committee seeks panels and individual papers
that, in examining past and present practices of
citizenship, sustainability and belonging, will also further
the ASA's commitment to forging an inclusive community of
participants from the arts, policy makers, journalists,
community organizers and activists, K-16 educators, and
international scholars. The conference theme provides a
platform, from the nation's capitol, no less, for enhancing
the ASA's public profile in a consequential way. In addition
to fostering collaboration with communities, both in the DC
region and nationally, we also hope that the theme will
attract a wider range of scholars, not only from the
humanities, cultural studies, and visual culture fields that
have been mainstays at ASA meetings, but also Americanists
working in the social science disciplines, including
economists, demographers, legal scholars and advocates,
scholars and practitioners in urban design and planning,
geographers, and scholars in such fields as material
culture, policy studies, and public health and psychology.
We welcome proposals from scholars working in the
pre-twentieth century fields, including the colonial era,
the early Republic, and the nineteenth century.

An engagement with citizenship as enacted through various
modes of practice opens the door to explorations of the
concept from multiple perspectives and locations, including
but not limited to: the historical and contemporary politics
of immigration and deportation, voting rights, Native
American sovereignty, practices of belonging or exclusion
enacted through music, literature, or media; the history and
legacy of social movements from the 18th to the 21st
centuries, discourses of human rights and challenges to our
understandings of the human, or projects historicizing U.S.
racial practices and/or analyzing processes of racialization
and constructions of religious identity in the post 9-11
world. Other key issues might include the role of market
relations - corporations, unions, finance, and consumer
culture - in shaping and redefining notions of citizenship
and civic belonging; the making of global cities or pastoral
dreams; contestations over citizenship through struggles
over representation in artistic, literary and cultural
production; histories of sex, practices of gender, and the
debates over same-sex marriage; the impact of wars and
revolutions on categories of belonging; systems of labor,
work, and inequality and their ideological justifications;
issues of academic freedom, past and present; the relation
between religious practice and political behavior; the
political dimensions of disease (mental and physical),
disasters, and epidemics; politics of the body and
constructions of disability; environmental justice; legal
and constitutional studies, both nationally and
internationally; science and technological studies; access
to public spaces, spheres, and resources; internal and
expansionist empires, and so on.

By no means do we wish to create the impression that
proposals must literally integrate or incorporate all three
pillars of our tripartite theme. Rather, we seek proposals
of panels, individual papers, and roundtable sessions that
foreground at least one of those admittedly big ideas,
ideally while placing them in a sort of dialogue with the
others. We seek papers and panels that examine issues
related to one (perhaps more) of these three concepts in
depth, which strikes us as preferable to proposals that
attempt to cover all three concepts referenced in the theme.
As with citizenship, we thus propose ideas of sustainability
and belonging as somewhat free-standing and in themselves
expansive rubrics for scholarship.

Those wishing to submit proposals for individual papers,
sessions, presentations, performances, films, roundtables,
workshops, conversations, or alternative formats on any
topic dealing with American cultures, should consult the
detailed on-line submission requirements posted on the
conference website: http://www.theasa.net/annual_meeting/


Contact:

Convention Coordinator
American Studies Association
1120 19th Street NW, Suite 301
Washington, DC 20036
USA
Phone: +1 202 467.4783
Fax:   +1 202 467.4786
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://www.theasa.net/annual_meeting/



__________________________________________________

InterPhil List Administration:
http://interphil.polylog.org

Intercultural Philosophy Calendar:
http://cal.polylog.org

Reply via email to