__________________________________________________

Conference Announcement

"The Idea of Cosmopolitanism"
Interdisciplinary Dialogues
Centre for the Humanities, Utrecht University
Utrecht (Netherlands)
3-5 December 2009

__________________________________________________


Jointly organised with:
Centre for the Humanities (Utrecht), Birkbeck College (London),
Research for the Leverhulme Trust Research Network and NWO-British
Council International Grant in the Humanities.

As part of the Leverhulme funded three year project, "Between
Cosmopolitanism and Empire: Europe, Human Rights, Sovereignty"
(co-ordinated by BBK College, London) and NWO-British Council funded
two-year project, "Cosmopolitanism, Identity and Media" (co-ordinated
by Polis, LSE and CfH, UU), The Centre for the Humanities, Utrecht
University, will host the three-day conference "The Idea of
Cosmopolitanism: Interdisciplinary dialogues" on 3-5 December 2009.
The conference is also the second instalment in the CfH’s Treaty of
Utrecht visiting Professorship endowed by the Province of Utrecht. In
the autumn of 2009 the chair is held by Professor Paul Gilroy. (Read
more on the chair and its activities on the Centre for the
Humanities’ website: http://www.hum.uu.nl/cfh/)

The conference aims at presenting and debating a broad spectrum of
issues involving cosmopolitanism in recent years. These range from a
philosophical and legal perspective to radical contestations of
equality and difference to media related interventions. Tying ideas
of cosmopolitanism in with social theory and the processes of
multidimensional globalisation demands a renewed and further
understanding of cosmopolitanism itself. It also requires sharper and
more grounded distinctions between globalization – as a process – and
cosmopolitanism as a concept. This allows one to deal with the
problematic side effects of globalisation. The growing use of film
and documentary as a mode of creating a critical public sphere
engaging and resisting a hegemonic mode of global capital and
military intervention will be investigated during this conference.
This means that the conference hopes to involve not only humanities
and social sciences but also media studies and political theory in
the debate on the idea of cosmopolitanism. As the conference is
furthermore grounded in the upcoming 300th anniversary of the signing
of the peace treaty between Spain, England, France and the Lower
Countries in 1713 in the city of Utrecht, the focus on the Treaty of
Utrecht will allow the participants to explore the very particular
and localised issues of international law in a historical perspective
and in terms of the Treaty’s impact on today. (Read more on the
Treaty of Utrecht’ website: http://vredevanutrecht.com/portal/)

PRELIMINARY PROGRAMME:

Thursday 3 December 2009
Comparing Practices of Cosmopolitanism

This first day of the conference commences with a panel discussion in
which the position papers by delegates from the different institutes
involved introduce and present their respective projects. How may
cosmopolitanism be understood philosophically, legally and in terms
of humanitarian interventions within the globalising process of
today? The focus on the Treaty of Utrecht invites scholars on history
of international law and humanitarian legal structures to speak to
the anniversary of the Treaty, and issues of tolerance and
citizenship in relation to cosmopolitanism are therefore
foregrounded. This first session aims to enable a cross-reference and
engagement between the disciplinary aspects and concepts employed in
the idea of cosmopolitanism and to map out the shifting of meanings
and usages.

PLENARY:
Morning session: 10-12:30
Location: Sweelinck Room (to be confirmed)
Chair: Rosi Braidotti
Panel Speakers: Costas Douzinas (for the Leverhume Trust), Lilie
Chouliaraki (for the NWO/LSE), Paul Schnabel (for the Treaty of
Utrecht) and Bald de Vries (for the Law Faculty/to be confirmed)

PLENARY:
Afternoon session: 17:15: Inaugural Lecture Treaty of Utrecht
Professor Paul Gilroy
Location: Aula, Academie Gebouw – Domplein – Utrecht
Chair: Professor Wiljan van den Akker (Dean Faculty)

Friday 4 December 2009
Cosmopolitanism, Postcolonialism and Human Rights

The second day of the conference elaborates and adds depth to the
discussions that were initiated in the first session’s position
papers. It explores ways in which cosmopolitanism can be rethought
from a postcolonial and human rights point of view. It seeks to
challenge the traditional understanding of the concept of
cosmopolitanism as a common, universal human morality by discussing
the concept through postcolonial, feminist and other critical
theories. The idea of cosmopolitanism as well as the concept of
freedom are questioned in light of global injustices so as to suggest
new ways of understanding concepts such as freedom and human rights
in a globalised setting. The hope is to explore new cosmopolitanism
as basis for solidarity. Furthermore the session aims to address
questions relating to the impact of globalising forces on the idea of
universal human rights. It suggests that a cosmopolitan perspective
causes a demand for reflexivity on human rights, both as a political
and legal concept.

PLENARY:
Morning session: 10-12:30
Location: to be announced
Chair: to be announced
Speakers: Costas Douzinas, Sneja Gunew

PLENARY:
Afternoon session: 14-17:00
Location: to be announced
Chair: to be announced
Speakers: Eugene Holland, Pheng Cheah

Saturday 5 December 2009
Workshop on Cosmopolitanism, Identity, Media and Communication

These panel discussions are funded by a NWO-British Council grant and
are the first of three workshops on the issue of cosmopolitanism,
identity and media. This section follows the previous two sections by
relating the concept of cosmopolitanism as a common human morality or
as relational solidarity and ethics to the technological and
communicative advances of mass media, new media and film making.
Arguably, mediated suffering call upon spectators to react or
empathise with the sufferers on TV. It calls upon a common human
morality to extend feelings of solidarity and pity to those who are
not like the Western spectators. The media may also produce a
pity-fatigue in the spectators. Moreover, journalistic practices
enhanced through networked technology, citizen journalism and the
internet shatter the idea of the media’s mediating role as gate
keeper and controller of who spectators can emphasise with. ‘The
other’ is brought into proximity, not through pictures and by evoking
feelings of pity, but by bringing him or her communicatively closer.
This section will therefore discuss the humanitarian level of
cosmopolitan media. In addition this section discusses issues of the
use of media as a resistance strategy and as a means of formulating a
kind of cosmopolitan solidarity in terms of for instance indie media
and the use of media by anti-globalisation social movements more
generally and the relation to human rights activism.

PANEL DISCUSSION I: Mass Media
Morning session: 10-12
Location: to be announced
Chair: Bolette Blaagaard
Participants: Pheng Cheah (Berkeley), Natalie Fenton (Goldsmith)

PANEL DISCUSSION II: New Media
Afternoon session: 13:30-16:00
Location: to be announced
Chair: Lilie Chouliaraki
Participants: Charlie Beckett (LSE), Christina Slade (City), Mirca
Madianou (LSE), Bolette Blaagaard (UU)

PANEL DISCUSSION III: Migrant Cinema
Evening session: 16:15-18:15
Location: to be announced
Chair: Charlie Beckett
Participants: Jackie Stacey (Birmingham), Sandra Ponzanesi (UU),
Yosefa Loshitzky (UEL), Lilie Chouliaraki (LSE)


Contact:

Esther J.A. Rinkens 
Centre for the Humanities
Utrecht University
Achter de Dom 20
NL-3512 JP Utrecht
Netherlands
Tel: +31 30 2534725
Email: e.rink...@uu.nl
Web: http://www.hum.uu.nl/cfh/

 
 
 
__________________________________________________

InterPhil List Administration:
http://interphil.polylog.org

Intercultural Philosophy Calendar:
http://cal.polylog.org

Reply via email to