__________________________________________________

Call for Papers

"Intellectual Topographies and the Making of Citizenship"
3rd CECC Conference on Culture and Conflict
Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Cultura (CECC),
Universidade Católica Portuguesa
Lisbon (Portugal)
11-12 November 2010

__________________________________________________


More than a century after the Dreyfuss affaire and Zola’s publication
of the open letter “J’accuse!”, the intellectual’s decline in our
Western culture has become a common notion. It gained ground after
the death of Sartre who, like Voltaire and Hugo before, became
emblematical of his century. It acquired visibility with the finalist
thematic that pervaded the intellectual debate of the second half of
the 20th century (the “end of the subject”, “metaphysical” and
scientific truth, beauty and history). Adding to this notion, and
along with other factors, are the new technological conditions that
altered radically the circulation of ideas, the explosion of
information, the democratization of higher education, the
appropriation of the “cultural” by marketing, the devaluation of
Humanities, and the intellectual’s professionalization and expertise.

Since the eighties, attention has been paid to intellectual
itineraries, currents of opinion and main trends. Typologies and
diagnosis concerning the intellectual’s role, evolution and
sociological status emerged. The need for his historical agency,
either in the traditional role of supervisor and legislator or as a
mere interpreter, seems to linger persuasively, conveying the
impression that the intellectual institution is neither dead nor
terminal, even though the grand era of thought and intellectual
fractures seems by-gone. If our online village, with its nonstop news
in real time, recycled repertoires, fast-thinking and
cyber-entertainment, responds better to the image and pathos than to
the logos, the urgent call for their assistance in shaping a more
reflexive modernity is audible. They should help us deal with the
discontinuities and caesuras with traditions and ideologies, make
sense of the general fragmentation of meaning, cope with relativism,
deregulations – financial, ethical and environmental –, the
ever-increasing complexities and risks of our post-modern world.
Decisive seems to be their authority for the definition of a common
ground from which to project standards and combat the abuse of
powers. Regardless of the field of their expertise, whether they
speak out publically from the arenas of cultural wars, often
contradicting the mainstream media opinion-makers, or remain private
in the safe-haven of their his academia, we still expect them to stay
at once detached from and superior to the sectarian perspectives of
particular national and economic interests, ethnic concerns, and
religious obligations.

Cross-disciplinary submissions are welcome, among others, on the
following topics:
- assessing the intellectual’s role and output in our technological
  culture
- bridging domains irremediably apart, enhancing continuities within
  the cognitive, political, ethic and aesthetic spheres of meaning, or
  overcoming obsolete traditions and creating new values
- re-contextualizing science in a humanistic perspective
- safeguarding fundamental human rights in a multicultural world
  where there are still cultural wars - racial, of gender or religious
  - which require the negotiation of cultural diversity
- shedding light on the long-term effects of colonialism,
  totalitarianism and genocide that burden our contemporary memory, as
  well as on the manipulation of conflicts and wars
- re-thinking Europe’s cultural identity as an intersection of
  cultural traditions and tensions between the local and the global,
  between nationalism and cosmopolitanism
- Instituting environmental ethics from a broad perspective and
  within multiple contexts as a condition of possibility for a common
  cultural front

Areas of Studies:
Philosophy – History – Sociology – Anthropology – Religion – European
Studies – American Studies – Comparative Studies – Culture Studies –
Media Studies – Literature – Art

Conference Language
The conference language is English.

Submissions:
Proposals for 20-minute papers should be sent to <[email protected]> by
16 August 2010. Submissions should include the abstract in English
(200 words), your name, e-mail address, institutional affiliation and
a brief bio (max. 100 words) mentioning main research interests,
projects and selected publications. The Organizing Committee will
return its decision by 16 September 2010. A selection of the papers
will be published after the conference. All papers should be sent by
e-mail by 30 November 2010.


Contact:

Rosário Lopes
Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Cultura
Faculdade de Ciências Humanas
Universidade Católica Portuguesa
Palma de Cima
1649-023 Lisboa
Portugal
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://intellectualtopographies2010.blogspot.com
 
 
 
 
__________________________________________________


InterPhil List Administration:
http://interphil.polylog.org

Intercultural Philosophy Calendar:
http://cal.polylog.org

__________________________________________________
 
 

Reply via email to