__________________________________________________

Call for Papers

"Africa in the 21st Century
and the Quasquicentennial of the Scramble of Africa"
International Symposium
Africa Institute of South Africa (AISA)
Tshwane/Pretoria (South Africa)
25-27 May 2011

__________________________________________________


I. Background

125 years ago nearly 1000 self-identifying communities of unexplored
diversity, complexity and variation, were arbitrarily carved up with
the explicit objective of regulating and stabilising European imperial
interests and formalising colonial control. This implicitly negated
sovereignty and autonomy of Africa and its peoples. A cynical act
endorsed abroad had the power of destroying relationships of trust
that were the result of a long evolutionary history. By its adoption,
the General Act of the Berlin Conference of 1885 segregated all the
peoples of Africa (except Ethiopia and Liberia to a large extent),
divided them and established the various mechanisms for their
subjugation and exploitation. The Scramble of Africa that this act
unleashed resulted in colonisation of Africa and would later see 53
post-colonial states emerge from the mid 20th Century. In 2010, more
than one third of the existing states will celebrate their jubilee
anniversaries.

The legacy from the Berlin conference still lives on. The
post-colonial states inherited the formula of divide and rule. Today,
Africa still lives with the challenge of communities within states
that should not be, and conversely, those that should have within
states that were split apart. The states that emerged did not
transcend this dilemma. In 2010, Cameroon, Togo, Madagascar,
DR-Congo, Somalia, Benin, Niger, Burkina Faso, Cote d'Ivoire, Chad,
Central African Republic, Congo-Brazzaville, Gabon, Senegal, Mali,
Nigeria and Mauritania, will all celebrate their Jubilee anniversary.
None of them are yet free from the burden inherited from the scramble
for Africa. Fifty years after they formally became politically
independent virtually none of these countries have overcome this
burden.

>>From the divide and rule formula from the scramble for Africa, many
states have suffered civil wars, conflicts, military rule, limited
economic development, and made Africa open to interference by outside
powers. However, there have been some star performers, strong
democracies, good governments and impressive economic developers.
Until the global recession starting in 2008, most of the continent
grew at about 6% annually; many were on track to meet the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs); most countries were democracries and a
growing number subscribed to the African Peer Review Mechanism.

II. The Shadow over the Jubilee Anniversary: The Scramble for Africa

The borders drawn 125 years ago remain artificial and many states
have not transformed into nations being held together precariously
and threatened with possible conflict at one time or another. The key
prize for the European Scramble for Africa was the Congo Basin. The
real fight amongst the Portuguese, the French and King Leopold of
Belgium was over who takes control of the Congo River, the DR- Congo
and Congo-Brazzaville. Actually the Germans used the title: "Kongo
Conference" instead of what is popularly known today as the Berlin
Conference at the time. Frantz Fanon used to say: 'Africa is like a
revolver, the Congo Basin is the trigger. Whoever controls the Congo
controls Africa.' Sad to say, the fight for the control of the Congo
is still on. From the outset Congo's independence was messy. The
first leader Patrice Lumumba was murdered by those powers that had
big stakes to plunder Congo's wealth which continues today. Others
use Congo's riches, whilst the people of the Congo are left with the
curse of war. Today, the problems fester on. Congo provides a vivid
example that the plan concocted 125 years still lives on with no
clear way out of the crises yet.

No other place in Africa exemplifies the playing out of the tragic
drama of the scramble for Africa as Sudan's independence in 1956. The
moment of celebration was also the moment of rebellion against what
the British put together as Sudan. The Arabised North Sudan was
celebrating freedom from Anglo-Egyptian control. The wishes of the
people in South Sudan for a fedearation went unanswered and an armed
struggle started shortly after independence; which went on for more
than three decades broken into two periods. There will be a
referendum in 2011 that could see South Sudan becoming a separate
state.

Though Sudan became independent before Ghana, the African
de-colonisation has been recognized to have begun with Ghana's black
star shining over its red, yellow and green flag flying high and the
British Union Jack  flag coming down on March 6, 1957. Ghana declared
that freedom for Ghana is incomplete without all of Africa becoming
united and free. Kwame Nkrumah understood the more important
challenge is not only to get Ghana independent but also to overcome
the legacy of the Scramble for Africa by uniting all of Africa. The
death of Apartheid in South Africa in 1994 heralded the end of the
independence struggles (bar Spanish Sahara, but the desire for a
united Africa still remains a dream.

Africa is not without historical achievements to resist the
continuation of the scramble for Africa today. Two distinct
successful examples of resistance were achieved by Haiti, from the
African world outside the continent, and Ethiopia inside Africa. In
different ways, both held the African resistance, liberation and
independence imagination for a long time; Haiti by becoming the first
black independent Republic since 1791. Napoleon's 60,000 armed forces
could not stand up to the power and force of Toussaint L'Ouverture
and his gallant comrades. Unfortunately Haiti's independence took the
form of a neo-colonial settlement where France demanded indemnity to
the tune of 22 billion dollars that Haiti kept paying until recently
helping to keep it the most impoverished state in the Americas. It
has taken nearly 109 years to pay off this indemnity turning Haiti
from a rich sugar cane producer to an impoverished and vulnerable
state. Haiti ended up attracting all forms of humiliation to a point
now it has been literally exhausted having been turned into a real
charity basket. One wonders how much her history of resistance has to
do with this attempt to degrade this nation into a historical
non-entity.

Ethiopia in Africa is the other inspiring country that held the
independence imagination for over 500 years. Ethiopia was a kingdom
and not a republic like Haiti, but it remained un-enslaved,
un-degraded and un-colonized fighting all the powers that came to
subvert its independence. In recognition of these, the Ethiopian flag
has served as the flag of independence for 15 African states and the
Organisation of African Unity or now the African Union. Like Nkrumah
in 1963 Emperor Haile Selassie said, "Our liberty is meaningless
unless all Africans are free." Nevertheless, like Haiti, Ethiopia too
remains an exhausted African nation for the price it paid for holding
high the independence, resistance and liberation imagination of the
entire African world. In 1991 Ethiopia became split into vernacular
and ethnic enclaves and Eritrea also was split from Ethiopia. Africa
can draw positive lessons from Ethiopia's history of independence. It
can draw lessons of what to avoid also from what has happened to
Ethiopia since 1991 when the country degraded into vernacular and
ethnic boundaries. From this ethnic and vernacular turn and division,
Africa can learn what not to do. What Africa needs is to expand its
human possibilities by attaining African level citizenship by
expanding identities to a common African humanity. This is the
priority. This is what it means to go beyond the history of the
scramble for Africa. This is the way for Africa to claim the 21st
century.

On October 1, 2010 the most populous state in Africa, Nigeria
celebrates its jubilee anniversary. Approximately one in five
Africans is a Nigerian. So Nigeria can be used as a template to judge
the performance, capabilities and potentials of the entire continent.
Nigeria is also important not only because it has one of the most
powerful economies in the continent, but also because it has the
largest market. Is Nigeria out of the woods or is there a scenario of
chaos within the country that would affect the entire continent owing
to being unable to overcome the legacy inherited 125 years ago?
Unfortunately, Nigeria has not been able to achieve a significant
proportion of its vast potential. It has had an unfortunate history
of military dictatorships and serious civil unrest (including a civil
war) as many other African countries. Its enormous natural resources-
particularly petroleum and gas- have often not been employed for the
development of the country but have instead been siphoned to foreign
bank accounts by unscrupulous politicians and public servants. There
has been a depletion of its public services in areas such as health,
power generation, education and social welfare and development. All
these drawbacks have combined to make Nigeria the so-called "sleeping
giant" of the continent.

The most powerful achievement of the end of the 20th century for
Africa was the coming of South Africa to the common Africa home.
South Africa became free in 1994 from racial domination. Its re-birth
combined its liberation with the lofty ambition for an African
renaissance and African century. South Africa is a potential leader
in Africa given the huge size of its economy relative to other
African states, and the access it has to many international policy
forums that other African states do not. It is not clear how other
African states see South Africa, as it is still not clear how much
Africa is a priority in South Africa's policy. Some countries see her
as a source of foreign investment, development strategies and a
fighter for African causes; whilst others resent the glory this so
called late comer is enjoying, neo-coloniser and some question her
Africanness. The issue of whether South Africa can give African
leadership by prioritizing Africa over states like Brazil, Russia,
India and China (BRICS) and other states outside Africa remains an
open question. As South Africa tries to go for the BRICS,
paradoxically it has lost ground to China, India and Brazil and
others to step in parts of Africa where South Africa is still yet to
make enduring collaborations.

III. Who would speak for Africa?

As the various regions of the world--Europe and the USA, Latin
America, Asia and Eastern Europe--line up behind major powers on
global issues, it is also necessary to reflect upon which voice or
regional leader should speak for Africa. It is clear that the United
States leads the rest of West and acts as its leading voice. Britain
always has accepted US leadership as a matter of its national policy
priority. They call it a special relationship. In Latin America,
Brazil and Argentina are jockeying to be the leading voices of the
region but increasingly Brazil is rapidly establishing itself as the
leading voice. China is contending with Japan for leadership in Asia.
But can the same trend be said to be taking place in Africa? The
picture is far from clear. The major states of Africa- South Africa,
Egypt, Ghana, Ethiopia, Libya, Senegal, Kenya and Nigeria- do need to
be clear of their roles in order to articulate a unifying vision that
speaks for the entire continent so that when Africans participate in
global forums there is a unity of voice and action. Participants of
the symposium are encouraged to provide engaging analyses of the
question of African leadership in Africa. How would Africans deal
with the world with united action and voice and respond to the world
so that they forestall being victims of division, manipulation and
seduction by  external aid to undermine Africa's overall interest in
today's international affairs distinguished by organized hypocrisy.
Are Africans ready to be led by other Africans and not the former
colonial powers or the new emerging powers? This is an important
matter related to whether Africa lives under the shadow of the old
and new scramble of Africa and is ready to close this ugly chapter of
its history. Who in Africa would speak for Africa remains an open
question?

IV. The Double Moment and Its Impact on Africa's Future

So after 125 years of the Berlin Conference, and 50 years after more
than a third of Africa celebrates the jubilee anniversary, the past
lives on in the present, threatening Africa's future. We believe it
is important to take this double moment of an infamous European
Scramble for Africa and the jubilee celebrations of more than a third
of Africa to pause, ask and reflect: which way is Africa going? Is
there a link between 125 afer Berlin and 50 years of the Jubilee
anniversary in 2010? If so what is this link? Is it positive or
negative? If negative how shall Africa overcome? How does Africa's
past speak to its present? How does the past's interaction with the
present shape and frame the future? There is a need to look back, to
understand today and in order to look ahead in the future.

V. The Key Trends in Africa

1. The old Scramble for Africa: is it over or does it still continue
in different guises with different actors and players?

2. The post-colonial states: are they robust or fragile? How can they
overcome the arbitrary carving up and splitting of ethnicities and
vernacular communities? Is it by degrading to vernacular and ethnic
states or by upgrading to the unity, resistance, independence and
liberation imagination as Africans? Which identity should take
priority or first place--the African, sub-ethnic or vernacular?

3. There is talk of the new scramble for Africa and in fact research
is being undertaken on how and why rising powers such as China and
India are re-carving Africa at least by searching to exploit Africa's
rich resources. How credible is this assertion?

4. The old European powers and the US are believed to be continuing in
concerted efforts to control Africa's natural resources.

5. How will Africans navigate from a past that lives on in the
present, threatening Africa's future to forge a 21st African Century?
Can Africa claim the 21st century? Are Africans ready to be led by
fellow Africans to construct Africa's capability to deal with a world
and respond without sacrificing Africa's values and interests? Who in
Africa should lead Africa, by displaying the ability to command
legitimacy from all?

6. There are a number of processes for integration: the Africa Union,
the Regional Economic Communities (RECs), NEPAD, and the Pan-African
Congresses--in different ways they all keep alive the Pan-African
imagination.

V. Some Themes for Writing Papers

The following sub-themes form the major preoccupations of the
conference:
* The Clash of Tradition and Modernity in Africa
* Pan-Africanism for the 21st Century
* The political economy of African Integration
* The Scramble for Africa and the Post-Colonial Nation-building
  Processes
* The Dilemma in Sudan and the Congo Basin
* The Challenges of building accountable institutions
* Governance, Democracy and Development in Africa
* Community centred services vs. state level policies for services
* The ethics of public service and the struggle against corruption
* Energy exporters African states are Energy poor: why?
* Energy importing developed countries are energy rich - Why?
* The Imperative of African Integration
* Indigenous Knowledge Systems
* The New Scramble for Africa: China, India, Russia and Brazil
* Pivotal States: South Africa, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Kenya, Senegal,
  Libya
* North Africa and the rest of Africa
* Lusophone, Francophone, Anglophone Africa vs. Africa-phone Africa?
* The United States of Africa or the Africa Nation
* The Pan-African Congresses and Pan-Africanism
* Towards the 8th Pan-African Congress and Peoples Pan-Africanism
* Japan, Europe and USA and Africa
* Who in Africa can and should lead Africa? Can Africans agree to be
  led by Africans?
* How can the barriers that prevent African engagement with other
  Africans be removed?

VI. Concluding Remark

Whether the scramble for Africa lives on or not, still to this day in
substantive terms African engagement with other Africans is mostly
secondary to their respective engagement with others outside Africa.
There is more disengagement with one another than the much needed
engagement that should be driving African history forward.

There is a need to acknowledge all the positive data to counter
effectively either the continuation of the old or the new scramble for
Africa. Africa must claim the 21st century as the African century. The
lessons of the past, the challenges of the present, and the
opportunities and possibilities of the future must be combined to
bring African unity now. This is the real challenge confronting
Africa.

All the positive energies from within Africa must be integrated to
make Africa achieve agency for navigating the contours of a difficult
world. As Africa had the rawest deal in human history all efforts
must be made to make sure all of Africa or united Africa gets a fair,
just and new deal. Before the year 2010 is over, there is a need to
make the broadest possible education on both the scramble for Africa,
the threat of the new Scramble, the opportunities for making Africa's
time this 21st century and gathering and disseminating the value of
positive data that can be gleaned from all positive histories in the
African world (we must not ignore the negative issues, but learn from
them). Such concerted actions and education using technologies and
various ways of teach-ins must be spread across the African universe
with interest and joy.

VII. Date of Conference

The proposed symposium is meant for participants for all over the
world and would take place in Tshwane/Pretoria, South Africa. The
symposium would be held in May 25-27, 2011.

Timelines:
Submission of abstracts: 16 January 2011
Notification of accepted abstracts: 29 February 2011
Submission of peer-reviewed papers: 26 March 2011

Expected Outcomes:
a) An empirically sound conference paper for presentation
b) Consideration for special journal edition for selected papers
c) Compilation of conference proceedings into a book


Contact:

Dr. Lekhotla Mafisa
Africa Institute of South Africa
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://www.ai.org.za/page.php?pid=38
 
 
 
 
__________________________________________________


InterPhil List Administration:
http://interphil.polylog.org

Intercultural Philosophy Calendar:
http://cal.polylog.org

__________________________________________________
 
 

Reply via email to