__________________________________________________

Conference Announcement

Theme: Indian Cosmopolitanism and its Paradoxes
Type: International Workshop
Institution: Tata Institute of Social Sciences
   Department of Social Anthropology, University of Bergen
Location: Mumbai (India)
Date: 8.–9.9.2011

__________________________________________________


A voluminous body of research has been devoted to social conflicts in
India. From interreligious tension through the persisting
discrimination of Dalits, Adivasis and the poor to ongoing gender
struggles, these studies have been crucial in pinpointing the
divisive aspects of India’s exceptional heterogeneity. Despite the
merits of each individual study, however, their sheer volume appear
to have exaggerated the impression of the social tensions that mark
everyday life in India’s many towns and villages. Thus other scholars
have rather chosen to turn their attention to places and social
contexts in which people of different backgrounds share social space
in an amiable way. Whether analysed in terms of fuzziness, composite
culture, civility, hybridity, creolisation, everyday
multiculturalism, charity, tolerance or more recently
cosmopolitanism, these studies may easily fall into the opposite
pitfall of overemphasizing harmony and altruism. The deliberate
selection of places and settings in which amiability entirely
overshadows resource competition, exclusion and disagreement
inevitably results in disproportionately optimistic portrayals of the
realities on the ground.

In this workshop we hope to stimulate discussions that reflect the
tension between these research orientations in order to rethink the
last decade’s marked emphasis on cosmopolitanism in political
philosophy and social anthropology from an Indian regional context.
Originally Greek for “citizen of the world” (from ‘cosmos’, world,
and ‘polites’, citizen), the term “cosmopolitanism” usually refers to
global orientations, openness to heterogeneity and a willingness to
engage with those perceived as the “Other”, as in the works of Kwame
Anthony Appiah, Martha Nussbaum, Ulrich Beck and Pratap Bhanu Mehta.
Several forms o Indian “vernacular cosmopolitanism” – as Pnina
Werbner termed it in “Anthropology and the New Cosmopolitanism” (2008)
– have already been described, and more are on their way.

In order to contribute to this emergent scholarship while avoiding its
romanticizing pitfalls, this workshop invites to discuss questions
such as

- How do cosmopolitan and conflicting forces contradict one another?
For instance, how is the ‘centralising’ sense of common nationhood
promoted by schools, international cricket matches, commercial movies
and markets counterworked by the ‘decentralising’ group affiliation
promoted by many religious practices and socio-political movements?

- What do we make of social practices, values or legislations that are
cosmopolitan in one sense but exacerbate social cleavages in another?
For example, in what way can the proscription of expressions that
wound religious sentiments or social dignity have marked integrating
effects at the same time as it reinforces social cleavages in another
sense?

- In what ways can explicit claims of cosmopolitan altruism mask
exclusionary practices? For instance, how can openness to people of
other religious denominations go hand in hand with active distancing
from people hailing from social segments held to be inferior?

- What are the limits of religious cosmopolitanism? Whether
understood in terms of fuzziness (Kaviraj), polytropy (Carrithers) or
chauraste/crossroads (Flueckiger), the tendency of showing respect
to, and seeking assistance from, religious specialists of other
denominations than one’s own is clearly not unlimited – but where
does the limit go, and why?

This workshop will offer the opportunity to take stock of the
contradictory social forces of cosmopolitanism and conflict, revisit
some of the academic debates on these issues over the past decades,
and present fresh empirical material that reflects the tension
between these contradictory orientations.


Contact:

Virginius Xaxa
Email: [email protected]

Kathinka Froystad
Email: [email protected]
 
 
 
 
__________________________________________________


InterPhil List Administration:
http://interphil.polylog.org

Intercultural Philosophy Calendar:
http://cal.polylog.org

__________________________________________________
 
 

Reply via email to