__________________________________________________

Call for Papers

Theme: Universality and Its Limits
Type: 2013 Weissbourd Annual Conference
Institution: Society of Fellows in the Liberal Arts and Franke
Institute for the Humanities, University of Chicago
Location: Chicago, Il (USA)
Date: 3.–4.5.2013
Deadline: 1.3.2013

__________________________________________________


The Society of Fellows in the Liberal Arts at the University of
Chicago invites paper proposals for the annual Weissbourd Memorial
Conference, to be held May 3–4, 2013 at the Franke Institute for the
Humanities. Its theme is “Universality and Its Limits.”

It has become relatively commonplace to think of scholarship in the
humanities and social sciences as eschewing an orientation toward
universals, and focusing instead on the exploration of differences,
situations, and particularities of various kinds. At a time when the
politics and aesthetics of difference are suspected to be largely
compatible with the universal advent of global capitalism, might the
reassessment of universals and their dissemination remain a critical
topic for academic scrutiny? Across vast differences of history and
geography, disciplinary alignments, and theoretical orientations, we
propose a collective reappraisal of how our research topics and our
core methods (description, narration, interpretation, analysis,
synthesis, explanation, and speculation) continue to negotiate and
challenge, both implicitly and explicitly, various forms of
universality.

Universal declarations of rights and cosmopolitan political
principles have been criticized for their lack of attention to
gender, economic inequality, cultural differences and democratic
sovereignty. Ideals of universal “goods” have also been challenged in
the name of moral pluralism. The idea of a progressive (or
regressive) universal course to history and a universalist approach
to the divine and the transcendent have been questioned. Does this
mean that we should stop articulating issues of politics, aesthetics,
ethics, law, history, or religion within the language of
universalism? Or should we keep a universalist standpoint and
investigate further the processes of negotiation and mediation that
allow the incorporation of the particular, the social or the
historical into this universalist frame?

Among the various media of aesthetic production—music, literature,
theater, dance, film, visual art, interactive games, and so
on—scholars frequently place emphasis on the interpretation of works
in light of their attendant cultural and historical contexts,
emphasizing their particularity and aesthetic singularity. But what
kinds of universals, both implicit and explicit, still guide our
scholarly treatments of aesthetic production? How are we to assess
both poetics and aesthetics after the multi-cultural and vernacular
de-centering of the canon? Is their value still based in fundamental
questions they raise about human experience? Is it based on the
theory we use to interpret and understand them? How might figures,
metaphors and paradoxes of the universal be understood as integral to
the ontology of literature, philosophy, and art?

We encourage an exceptionally broad range of answers to these
questions from scholars in all fields of the humanities and social
sciences.

In particular, we hope to foster conversations about the following
topics:

- progress, stasis, and regression in history
- figures, tropes, and paradoxes of the universal
- the idea of a universal history
- universality in aesthetics, hermeneutics, and/or literary theory
- music and/or image as universal languages and a cultural particulars
- human values, human rights, and the humanities
- capitalism and anti-capitalism, and globalization
- humanism, anti-humanism, and post-humanism
- the interpretation of science, medicine, and technology
- immigrants, outcasts, vagrants, & minor literatures
- social media in history and the present
- work, labor, housing, social welfare, insurance, & money as
  universals
- the commodification of culture & the contested universality of mass
  culture
- philosophy and truth, universality and relativism
- the aesthetics, ethics, and politics of translation
- democracy, cosmopolitanism and sovereignty
- the meaning(s) of populism
- criticism and critique as universals
- the universality and particularity of media technologies
- the question of universality in studies of gender and sexuality
- universality and racial difference
- Plato, the Sophists, the Stoics, Aristotle, Aquinas
- Kant, Hegel, Arendt, and Badiou

Keynote Address

Our keynote lecture will be given by Jean-Michel Rabaté, Vartan
Gregorian Professor in the Humanities and Professor of English and
Comparative Literature at the University of Pennsylvania.

The title of Professor Rabaté’s lecture will be "Reasons of the
‘Absurd’: Paradoxes of the Universal from Kafka to Badiou."

Professor Eric L. Santner, Philip and Ida Romberg Distinguished
Service Professor in Modern Germanic Studies, Professor of Germanic
Studies, Committee on Jewish Studies, and the College will serve as
respondent.

To Propose a Paper or Panel

To propose a paper, please submit an abstract of 250
words or less, along with a brief biography of the presenter. Please
email this to conference co-chairs Michael Gallope and Geneviève
Rousselière at: [email protected]

We especially encourage the proposal of entire panels. To propose a
panel, provide the above material for all presenters, along with a
panel title and an explanation of its ambit, no more than 500 words
in length.

The deadline for all proposals is March 1, 2013.


Contact:

Michael Gallope and Genevieve Rousseliere, Co-Chairs
Email: [email protected]
Web:
http://societyoffellows.sites.uchicago.edu/news/2013-weissbourd-annual-conference




__________________________________________________


InterPhil List Administration:
http://interphil.polylog.org

Intercultural Philosophy Calendar:
http://cal.polylog.org

__________________________________________________

 

Reply via email to