__________________________________________________

Call for Papers

Theme: The Main Intellectual Currents in the Late Ottoman Empire
Type: 4th Annual MUBIT Doctoral Workshop in Late- and Post-Ottoman
Studies
Institution: MUBIT Inter-University Doctoral Cooperation in Islamic
and Middle Eastern Studies, University of Basel
Location: Basel (Switzerland)
Date: 20.–21.5.2016
Deadline: 15.3.2016

__________________________________________________


An international workshop with Prof. Dr. Sukru Hanioglu (Princeton
University), organized by MUBIT Inter-University Doctoral Cooperation
in Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies Basel/Zurich & Middle Eastern
Studies, The Graduate School of Social Sciences (G3S), University of
Basel, Switzerland.

This two-day workshop will concentrate on the major intellectual
currents of late Ottoman history. The main thread of the workshop
will follow intellectual history in a broad sense, but other topics
including social, religious, and political history will receive some
coverage as well. 

The workshop will include four sessions:

1. Ottoman Materialism

The salient characteristic of late Ottoman materialism is the belief
in science as the exclusive foundation of a new Ottoman society.
Mid-nineteenth-century materialism, a Weltanschauung placing science
at the core of a new and rational civilization, usually entailed
rejection of all competing truths, both philosophical and religious.
In the Ottoman context, the conception of a new society strictly
regulated by scientific truth logically led to the rejection of the
old basis of society – the revealed truth of Islam. To the many
Ottoman intellectuals who passionately shared this worldview,
religion was the most dangerous type of philosophy, and a major
obstacle to social progress. So powerful was the attraction of the
doctrine of materialism to Ottoman thinkers that it became the
mainstream approach to philosophy in the late Ottoman Empire. Ottoman
materialism also made a profound impact on the founders of the
Turkish republic and its official ideology.

2. Ottoman Westernization and the Westernists

The institutionalization of Westernization under Mahmud II differed
considerably from previous attempts to confront European ideas. For
the first time, Westernization appeared as a formal policy linked to
extensive bureaucratic reform and implemented with brutal force. The
new schools provided the necessary manpower, while the government
newspaper supported the effort with appropriate propaganda for the
first time. These important changes had a lasting effect on the young
generation that came of age under Mahmud II, and provided the
foundation for the cadres of the later Tanzimat movement. Despite its
major impact on Ottoman society Westernization was not an
intellectual current especially until the Second Constitutional
Period. This period between 1908 and 1918 was one of the most
important epochs of Ottoman political thinking. During these years a
group of intellectuals called Garbcılar (Westerners) turned
Westernization into an intellectual current. They also made a
significant impact on the official ideology of the early Turkish
Republic.

3. Islamism in the Late Ottoman Empire

Modern Islamist movements emerged in the second half of the
nineteenth century did not make a considerable impact on the Ottoman
heartlands. Even the pious Ottoman sultan Abdülhamid II who initiated
a Pan-Islamist policy did not allow Islamist debates in these regions
of his realm. Despite the pronounced Islamist flavour of the sultan’s
rhetoric, Islamist intellectuals suffered immensely under his reign.
The sultan, who feared the potent capacity of the ulema to legitimize
criticism of his régime, banished a large number of them. At the same
time, the censor curtailed any serious religious debate. The Islamist
opposition worked with the Young Turks abroad, while the Salafī
movement flourished in Syria. It was only after the Young Turk
Revolution of 1908 that Islamist intellectual activity began to
thrive in the capital and the imperial heartland. It became the most
popular intellectual current until the end of the empire. The
Islamist movement also played a significant role during the
transition from the Ottoman Empire to the new republican regime in
Turkey. While the War of Independence fought between 1919 and 1922
was based upon Muslim nationalism, the extreme secularization under
the new regime dealt a shattering blow to Islamism in Turkey and
pushed it out of mainstream intellectual discussion until the
Islamist revival in 1970s.

4. Nationalist Movements in the Late Ottoman Empire

Nationalism was the dominating intellectual current of the last
Ottoman century. Started in non-Muslim Ottoman communities and
furnished a firm foundation from which to launch and legitimize
rebellion and separatism nationalism played a significant role in
shaping the Ottoman Empire. Many Christian Ottoman intellectuals
succumbed to the charms of nationalism, adopting a romanticized image
of the nation rising up from the ruins of a decadent empire. The
Ottoman world, and especially its more heavily Christian European
provinces, offered fertile ground for such ideas. Later on similar
movements emerged among Muslim Ottoman groups, such as the Albanians,
the Arabs, and the Kurds. Even small Muslim communities, like the
Circassians, exhibited a rise in nationalist sentiment. The level of
national consciousness varied considerably within each of these
movements. The most important nationalist movement during the last
years of the empire was undoubtedly Turkish nationalism. It started
as a proto-nationalist program and later acquired a political
character. The Turkism that had flourished among Ottoman expatriates
in Cairo, the capital cities of Europe, and other parts of the empire
during the later years of Abdülhamid II went from strength to
strength after the Young Turk Revolution of 1908, and also became a
pillar of the official ideology of the Turkish republic.

Application Procedure

PhD students who wish to attend the workshop are asked to send an
email to Dr. Selen Etingu ([email protected]), with a biographical
abstract explaining their research interests and projects as well as
their academic background (max. 400 words, in 3rd person singular, in
English). The deadline for the application is March 15, 2016.
Applicants will receive an answer regarding their participation on
March 21.

Requirements for Successful Participation

Accepted participants will receive a list of required readings by
March 21, 2016. Successful participation at the workshop is subject
to the mandatory completion of the required readings in advance and
active participation in the workshop discussions.    

For further details, please see attached document or go to:
https://nahoststudien.unibas.ch/en/research/gsss-mubit/mubit/course-programme/


Contact:

Dr. Selen Etingü, Coordinator
MUBIT Inter-University Doctoral Cooperation
Seminar of Middle Eastern Studies
University of Basel
Maiengasse 51
CH-4056 Basel
Switzerland
Email: [email protected]
Web:
https://nahoststudien.unibas.ch/en/research/gsss-mubit/mubit/course-programme/




__________________________________________________


InterPhil List Administration:
http://interphil.polylog.org

Intercultural Philosophy Calendar:
http://cal.polylog.org

__________________________________________________

 

Reply via email to