__________________________________________________

Call for Papers

Theme: Justice and Beliefs about Justice in Europe
Type: Philosophical Workshop
Institution: Project ETHOS
   Central European University (CEU)
Location: Budapest (Hungary)
Date: 18.–19.1.2019
Deadline: 31.10.2018

__________________________________________________


Organised as part of the second annual conference of the Horizon2020
research project ETHOS (Towards a European theory of justice and
fairness), funded by the European Union.

Europeans have strongly and, for practical purposes, intractably
divergent views about justice. The various European ‘crises’ – for
instance the sovereign debt crisis, the refugee crisis, and the
crisis of representation that can be seen through rising populism and
Euroscepticism – put these differences in the spotlight.

As far as distributive justice is concerned, some hold that Europe
should be more ‘social’, and that the EU should try to pursue greater
material equality amongst EU citizens and states. Others think that
it is an injustice that EU migrants to their country benefit from
social welfare provisions, or believe that wealthier, more
‘productive’ member states have no obligation to subsidize other
member states struggling with the consequences of high levels of
public debt. Distributive justice and injustices have gendered
dimensions: austerity policies have disproportionately affected
women, and many people believe that women’s gendered labour roles are
undervalued and under-rewarded, while others believe “the market”
should decide. Similarly, matters of recognitive justice are highly
disputed. Europe is divided about how to respond to the so-called
refugee crisis, and about whether or how ethnic, linguistic or
religious minorities should be accommodated, seen as full members of
“the nation”, or granted special protection. Some find misrecognition
or under-recognition at the root of much injustice, e.g. of the
subordination of women and their burdens as the usual primary carers,
or of the history of discrimination against Roma, Asian and
Afro-descendants, while others dismiss all “identity politics” as
claims not to equality with others but to special treatment. As a
struggle of representative justice, the project of European
integration has become increasingly questioned, shown both by
consistently dropping turnout in elections for the European
Parliament (from 61.99% in 1979 to 42.54% in 2014) and by the growing
success of nationalist Eurosceptic populism across Europe, not least
demonstrated by Britain voting to leave the European Union. And in
2018, women remain under-represented in public life in every European
country, while populist leaders like Viktor Orbán have claimed they
are not suited to it.

The aim of this workshop is to explore how political philosophers and
theorists of justice in Europe should take people’s attitudes and
beliefs about justice into account in non-ideal theorizing about
justice in Europe. For instance, does the method of reflective
equilibrium offer a suitable framework for proceeding in these
circumstances? Should theorists “take sides” unapologetically,
prioritizing what they regard, on reflection, as the “correct” views
about justice? Or are there overriding reasons, perhaps stemming from
democratic considerations or from the need for stability, to
integrate views we may not agree with into our proposals for how to
better realize justice in Europe and the EU? How and to what extent
should non-ideal theorizing about justice in Europe aim to change the
beliefs of the European public as we find them? The workshop seeks
answers to these pressing questions and reflection on related issues.

The three-year, inter-disciplinary ETHOS Horizon2020 research project
seeks to formulate the building blocks for a European theory of
justice that is normatively sound, reflective of European values, and
responsive to empirical data about citizens' views on justice and
experiences of injustice.


Submissions

If you wish to give a paper, please submit an abstract of 200-400
words to Miklos Zala: za...@ceu.edu

Deadline for abstracts: October 31, 2018


Keynote speakers

Alice Baderin (Lecturer in Political Theory, University of Reading)

Philippe van Parijs (Special guest professor, University of Louvain
and KU Leuven / Robert Schuman Fellow, European University Institute,
Florence)

Miriam Ronzoni (Reader in Political Theory, University of Manchester)

Andrea Sangiovanni (Chair in Social and Political Theory, European
University Institute, Florence)


Organizers

Bert van den Brink (Dean, University College Roosevelt, and Professor
of Political and Social Philosophy, Utrecht University)

Simon Rippon (Associate Professor, Philosophy and School of Public
Policy, Central European University)

Tom Theuns (Post-Doctoral Researcher, Utrecht University)

Miklos Zala (Post-Doctoral Researcher, Central European University)


Contact:

Miklos Zala
Central European University
Budapest, Hungary
Email: za...@ceu.edu
Web: https://ethos-europe.eu




__________________________________________________


InterPhil List Administration:
https://interphil.polylog.org

InterPhil List Archive:
https://www.mail-archive.com/interphil@list.polylog.org/

__________________________________________________

 

Reply via email to