__________________________________________________

Call for Publications

Theme: Climate Change and Global Distributive Justice
Publication: Edited Book published by E-International Relations
Deadline: 28.2.2021

__________________________________________________


We are looking for contributors for a book on Climate Change and
Global Distributive Justice.

With this volume we intend to collect contributions that help to
systematise and analyse the set of normative principles that indicate
how the costs and benefits of climate change should be shared, both
between states and between different generations.

The book will be edited by Fausto Corvino and Tiziana Andina, and
published by E-International Relations in online open access and in
print formats: https://www.e-ir.info/publications/

The issues we are interested in and we would be happy to discuss with
potential contributors are the following:

- Grandfathering (moderate vs. strong versions)
- Polluter Pays Principle (historical emissions; excusable ignorance
  objection; non-identity problem; dissolved states; outcome
  responsibility; Brasilian proposal; what do we do with
  non-anthropogenic climate change?)
- Beneficiary pays principle (with a clear distinction between
  consumption-based and production-based emissions)
- Emissions egalitarianism (including also Contraction and
  Convergence)
- Ability to Pay Principle (absolute wealth vs effective wealth; how
  do we deal with wealthy but environmentally responsible states?)
- Subsistence principle (the poorest should not be asked to take part
  in climate change mitigation)
- Hybrid accounts (theories that mix two or more of the
  aforementioned principles)
- Climate distributive justice and transgenerationality (many of the
  activities that cause emissions have a transgenrational nature, i.e.
  they require future generations to carry them out, what does this
  imply in terms of emissions distribution?)
- Climate distributive justice and the moral gap (how do we cope with
  the fact that although the majority of people recognise the danger
  of climate change, many of them do not feel motivated to change
  lifestyle and habits?)
- Climate distributive justice and indirect cooperation between
  different generations (why should we act responsibly toward future
  generations if they cannot do anything for us, and they can only act
  responsibly towards their own descendants?)
- Climate distributive justice and non-human nature (what moral
  duties do we have toward the non-human “victims” of climate change?)
- A brief history of climate change diplomacy, from Rio to Paris
  (with a focus on the distributive principles that have been
  proposed, criticised and adopted)
- Climate justice from theory to practice: what mechanisms can be put
  in place to ensure an economically and socially sustainable
  transition, once emission permits have been allocated according to
  justice? (e.g. cap and trade, emission trading systems, etc.).
- Climate justice from a non-Western perspective (we are particularly
  interested in how Eastern philosophy addresses and perceives the
  issues of distributive justice related to climate change)
- Climate justice and law (through which instruments can
  international or national law contribute to a fair allocation of
  emissions between and within single countries?)

We will accept contributions that address the issues listed above
from two main perspectives:

i) a theoretical examination of the normative justifications that
subtend each principle: highlighting reasons in favour of any
principle, possible criticisms and recalling the main references and
debated in the literature.

ii) a political and historical investigation on the role that each
principle has played in international negotiations and an analysis of
the social and economic implications that each principle would have
with respect to specific countries or groups of countries (e.g. which
countries would be allocated the biggest burden from a distribution
of emissions based on the beneficiary pays principle? Or which among
the beneficiary pays principle and the polluter pays principle would
help the developing countries most? Or what would emission
egalitarianism mean for the most developed countries?)

We welcome contributions that adopt both or only one of the two
perspectives, and we are also happy to discuss additional topics,
that are not on the list, with potential contributors.

Those interested in participating can write to Fausto Corvino
([email protected]) and Tiziana Andina
([email protected]), attaching a 200–300 word abstract of the
chapter they would like to write. Alternatively, they can also contact
the editors, at the same addresses, to discuss the inclusion of a
specific topic in the book.

The deadline for submitting abstracts is 28 February 2021. Full
texts, if commissioned, must then be sent by the end of August 2021.
Every accepted chapter will be between 4500–6000 words (excluding
references), and it should be written to be understood (within
reason) by non-specialists. So, please factor this into your
abstract. Our objective is to provide accessible and engaging
scholarship on the topics covered by the book.

Please find here full information about submission and deadlines:
https://www.e-ir.info/2020/11/25/call-for-contributors-climate-change-and-global-distributive-justice/



__________________________________________________


InterPhil List Administration:
https://interphil.polylog.org

InterPhil List Archive:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

__________________________________________________

Reply via email to