__________________________________________________

Call for Publications

Theme: The Political Economy of Care
Subtitle: Global and Local Chains
Publication: Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy
Date: Issue 1, 2022
Deadline: 1.4.2021

__________________________________________________


A longstanding criticism of mainstream political philosophy centres
on the denial of care work and the assertion of an autarkic,
self-sufficient subject. However, in addition to this (rather
academic) criticism by care ethics, an extensive body of literature
has emerged from lived experiences of political and social struggles,
primarily from feminists (of colour) that put friendship, love, and
coalition-building center stage (Ahmed, AnzaldĂșa, Black Lives Matter,
Care Collective, Combahee River Collective, Dalla Costa, Federici,
hooks, Lorde, Precarias a la deriva, Puig Della Casa, Sandoval,
etc.). This crisis of care reveals and acknowledges multiple
dimensions of structural, relational, and interpersonal violence and
oppression at the intersections of class, gender, and race.

The Covid-19 pandemic highlights once again that care work in most
countries is rendered almost exclusively by women who are poorly paid
and insufficiently valued for their labour. While some attempt to
juggle job and family responsibilities at the expense of their own
mental and physical health, others risk criminalization and
destitution due to insecure residency status or lack of permission to
work. Indeed, the chains of care have increasingly acquired a
transnational character and exploit the indentured labour of those
who cross borders to care for others. Take, for example, women from
the Philippines and other south-east Asian countries who provide
cleaning services and take care of children elsewhere in the world in
order to afford the nourishment and schooling of their own; or, care
work for the elderly and sick in western Europe that is done by
eastern European women who rarely get to see their own relatives.
Whether paid or unpaid, care work is disproportionately carried out
by racialized and gendered groups in precarious positions. Finally,
in an attempt to protect their own populations and to compensate for
the austerity of public healthcare provision, so-called developed
countries actively recruit medical professionals from former or
current colonies, who then staff hospitals and risk their lives
during the pandemic while separated from those care networks that
sustain their work. The acquisition and accumulation of PPE and
vaccines further exacerbate global inequities in public healthcare.

Furthermore, the concept of care extends beyond human beings, to
non-human entities such as the environment (Barad, de la Bellacasa,
Haraway, Stengers) and ways of conducting research (Dombrowski). In
light of all these discussions, we deem it necessary and timely to
ask:

- Should care be more central to philosophy and contemporary
  philosophizing?
- What are the political, economic, and social premises and impact of
  the global-local nexus of care?
- How does the systematic withholding of care from some groups of
  society follow from neoliberal variants of capitalism that have
  exploited racialized and feminised care workers since its inception?
- What is the logic of the non-caring or care-less rationality that
  underpins such exploitation, and does it also motivate the
  exploitation of our environment and the cosmos?
- What is fair or just access to healthcare?
- Will decent care be undermined by the growing power of algorithms
  in healthcare?
- What kind of philosophical toolbox do we need to adequately answer
  these questions?
- Can philosophy, or a philosophical approach, ask better questions
  to situate care at the centre of theoretical and practical inquiry?

Krisis invites you to contribute to this special issue about care by
interrogating our existing social and political structures of care
and by reconceiving and building on radical alternatives. Please send
your abstract for a paper to Krisis by 1 April 2021. We will let you
know if the abstract has been accepted not long thereafter. Then the
usual peer review phase follows.

We understand that many researchers face unexpected delays due to the
Covid-19 contingencies, including home-schooling, care duties and
increased teaching load. If you would like to submit an abstract but
are unable to do so in time, please do contact us to discuss an
alternative timeline.

Timeline:

Submission abstract:
April 1st 2021

Full paper:
September 1st 2021

Publication:
Issue 1 of 2022

More information and submission:
https://krisis.eu/callforpapers





__________________________________________________


InterPhil List Administration:
https://interphil.polylog.org

InterPhil List Archive:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

__________________________________________________

Reply via email to