Hi, I create a persisten class in %Cachelib namespace with name "%Pacote" in package "Suporte" with only one property "Desc" type String. When I try to compile, occurs:
Compiling table Suporte.%Pacote ... Suporte.%Pacote.T1.MAC [INT]LINE#: 11 OFFSET: 11 ERRORNUM: 1025 MESSAGE: Expected end of line TEXT: k ^Suporte.%PacoteD(%d(1)).... and a lot of more errors. Thanks for help -- Udo Leverentz Mayer Divis�o de Suporte Tribunal de Justi�a do Paran� www.tj.pr.gov.br "Peter Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu na mensagem news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gustav > > there is no neat way in current verison - class definition mapping is > promised for 5.1(?) > > You have 3 possibilities - all not very satisfactory > > a) duplicate the class definitions in DAT1 and DAT2 - with the global > storage mapped to a central namespace > > b) Install the things in %CacheLib - but they will get overriden when > you upgrade > > c) try some sexy global mapping - others have done this - search the > archive > > If I had to do this I would choose a) - it's clumsy but at least it's > a supported method > > Peter > > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:27:24 -0000, Gustav Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >Hi all > > > >I need several namespaces, say DAT1 and DAT2, each with a database, for > >data storage totally isolated from each other. > >However, I need too a namespace, say APPLIB, for some common objects > >(persistent) and routines which must be accessible from the above > >namespaces - much the same way as %CACHELIB is. > > > >What is the preferred method for achieving this? > >How would I from DAT1 reference an object in APPLIB? > > > >/gustav >
