Hi, Many components in .NET make working with objects easy. For example you can bind a collection to a grid.
But with the exisiting object access in Cache, Cache classes are not fully .NET compatible (like array/list of objects, so you might need to go with SQL access, which is not desirable. (But SQL access through ODBC.NET works very well, I have tested it myself, even faster than SQLConnection!). Also, accessing Cache objects as COM objects works fine. For me, I wish we had .NET binding now, because many collections need to be binded to grids, treelists etc, and writing SQL instead of direct object access is not fully utilizing the advantages of Cache. Regards, Teoman "John A. Bertoglio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I have a client who is condsidering using .NET to build the user interface > (the existing system is VB6) for a Cache 4 system. Has anyone done this? Are > there any issues? My instinct is that we should defer the change to .NET > until we upgrade to 5 or 5.1. Any ideas? > -- > John Bertoglio > Senior Consultant > co-laboratory > office: 503-538-8691 > mobile: 503.330.6713 > fax: 503.538.8691 > www.co-laboratory.com > > >
