Re: License limit exceeded?

[Bill McCormick]

A background job that manipulates devices will require an additional 
license. A single user download copy would not provide that license as 
it would be in addition to the jobs you can start as the user coming 
from localhost. That is my spin on this one at least. You would need 
real cache and a real license

Denver Braughler wrote:
Wes Knox wrote:
I noted in the console log that this first started on the 11th just after midnight. 
What do you mean by "slots"...warmstart jobservers?
Slot are concurrent processes.
In the old days we called them all jobs regardless of how they got started.

...or do I need to purchase a "real" copy?
Yes, it sounds like you need to purchase a license.

By the way, the persistent background job is still getting jobbed
successfully at startup...just can't sign on anymore!
Perhaps you were slipping through the 1000 lines of code loophole.