Florian
>If you want a system-wide singleton, you should make the singleton
>persistent and save the OID.
>But then you have to open it on every access and must synchronize the
>write-access on it, or use a background-process that manages it...
Yup that's the main issue here - you cannot have different instances
open in different processes
Also I fear the it would be inefficient
you would have to
a) get a lock
b) open the persistent object
c) Move to the end
d) append data
e) save (transfer from ^CacheTemp to the persistent location)
f) remove the lock
:{
Also there may be issues with having a background process doing the
work cos the in-memory copy of the stream temporarly saves data to
^CacheTemp (by default) so the saved version might not be the current
version
That's why I suggested a simpler method
So the key question is why do you need a stream???
Peter
