Ram�n guess who has tried :}
I do not think that this can be done at the mooment however there is a sort of work round have a look at the spool device (device 2) this directs all write statements to ^Spool now it is possible to map ^Spool to a Cache Stream property of a class and treat it as an object not nice - and you can only have 1 per process but it does work and yes I agree 1000% that it would be reeeeeely good to be able to set an IO device as a stream Peter On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 15:19:13 +0100, Ram�n Jim�nez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, > >Has anyone here ever tried to map a Cach� device to a stream? > >I've been thinking about this for a few months now... Especially after I >found what seems to be equivalent functionality in the Java binding. The >idea being that you could "shadow" a device (the current device, for >example) to a file or global stream, or alternatively being able to use >the stream API in some cases where currently you're restricted to the >device API. > >It would seem as if this can only be done by changing Cach� itself... Am > I right to think this? If so, are there any plans in this direction >for 5.1? > >Thanks in advance, > >Ram�n
