Bill McCormick wrote: > We won't give out our source. Do you verify that it is FIPS Pub 140-2 compliant?
Anyway, is making the vector the third (and optional) call-in argument an enhancement that ISC is likely to entertain? Or is that totally buried in the code? If the code isn't COS, that makes it all the more desirable to use on the presumption that it is optimized compiled or assembled code.
