http://www.iraqcp.org/members4/00812011w2.htm


Iraqi CP leader:  Iraqi-US Agreement is not best solution and aspiration.. 
but the best among bad options


The following are excerpts from the contribution of the Iraqi CP leader, Hamid 
Majeed Mousa, in the Iraqi Parliament session held on 22 November 2008 to 
discuss the Iraqi-US Agreement:  

"My remarks focus on the Agreement itself, though this does not mean that it is 
not linked to other Iraqi issues and concerns."

"Indeed, when one speaks of an agreement that concerns the withdrawal of 
foreign troops and foreign presence, one cannot be free of the bitterness into 
which we have been put. We were against the war and invasion, and we are 
striving to eliminate the occupation and its consequences. But at this moment, 
we must not forget the main cause that led the country to where we are; that is 
the former regime that had generated a lot of reasons for wars, invasion, 
occupation and more. Now, how to get out of this ordeal? How do we put the 
occupation in the place where it can be removed and its presence be eliminated? 
This is the core issue on which we decide our position.. Yes, there are no few 
remarks about the Agreement, and about its shortcomings and loopholes. We 
pinpointed the latter in adequate detail in the memorandum that we presented to 
the Council of Ministers and also in the discussions that took place with the 
Prime Minister. These shortcomings and loopholes have yet to be addressed, such 
as the inspections and export in Article 15, the jurisdiction and immunity in 
Article 12, and financial issues in Article 26."

"Here, when I am talking about the remarks and loopholes, I am not seeking 
something impossible, irregular or improper. (...) I believe that it is not 
right to think that Obama will be committed if the UN mandate is extended, and 
that he will not be committed if we sign the agreement. Obama is Obama whether 
there is an agreement or whether the UN mandate is extended. Therefore, we must 
interpret these factors and not make them essential. But there is a need to 
strengthen the U.S. commitment to the protection of Iraqi funds, both inside 
the U.S. and globally, through being committed to a new resolution from the UN 
Security Council under Chapter VII to protect these funds. This is possible and 
necessary. The Agreement refers to the possibility of amendment and scrutiny 
even after it is signed."

"It is my opinion, therefore, that the Agreement is not the best solution and 
aspiration, but the best among bad options. We are thus to choose the lesser of 
two evils, as long as this agreement ensures the withdrawal and evacuation in a 
specified and regulated period of time, and especially that it will be a United 
Nations document. Extending the UN mandate [for the presence of foreign forces 
in Iraq] means, in my opinion, remaining in square one; keeping everything as 
it is. The fact that this agreement contains a specific and final date for 
foreign presence, the need for phasing it out in a gradual and escalating 
manner, the lifting of immunity from foreign security firms, the exit of Iraq 
from UN Chapter VII, and not to attack neighbouring countries, implies steps 
towards the restoration of sovereignty. However, extending the UN mandate 
[which ends on 31 December 2008] means the continued presence of occupation 
with all its weight."

"We are therefore in front of a course that entails the restoration of 
sovereignty and independence in accordance with a specific timetable. This is 
what we should pay attention to and be concerned about despite the existence of 
the other shortcomings and loopholes which, I stress, can be amended in 
subsequent supplements."

"The proper implementation of the Agreement, and seriousness in implementation, 
are connected to our national unity and to creating a positive political 
atmosphere of reconciliation, consensus, deepening of democracy, and developing 
our national capabilities, including the armed forces, improving the government 
performance at the level of services and their provision, the proper management 
of the country's affairs away from quotas and violence and by the adoption of 
citizenship and elevating the status of Iraq .. Thus, in this way, we can 
implement the Agreement so as to achieve our goal of the evacuation and 
withdrawal of foreign forces and the restoration of sovereignty and independence

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke