Ref: Apakah banjirnya pengemis waktu lebaran bisa dijadikan indikator 
pertumbuhan ekonomi dan distribusi hasil pertumbuhan tsb kepada penduduk? Jadi 
bila bisa dikatakan, maka konklusinya: Makin sedkit pengemis makin nyata 
perbaikan kehidupan rakyat. 

Mengingat banjirnya pengemis pada hari raya agama,  maka pertanyaannya ialah 
apakah orang beragama hanya bermurah hati pada hari-hari raya agamanya dan oleh 
karena itu banjir kaum pengemis?

http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/08/28/lebaran-and-sea-beggars.html

Lebaran and the sea of beggars
Khairil Azhar, Jakarta | Sun, 08/28/2011 8:00 AM 


In Ramadhan, particularly in the days leading up to Lebaran (Idul Fitri), 
beggars rush en masse to Greater Jakarta in pursuit of good fortune. So, the 
Jakarta administration, as it did last year, has officially stated a policy to 
eradicate begging. With a slight difference, it will now scrupulously wipe out 
the syndicates behind the beggars. 

Yet, will it successfully cope with this systemic social problem which is 
deep-rooted in the black economy of the rank and file and their cultural 
anomies? 

Let’s start with a reflection on the past.

On a Saturday, a year ago, a busker got on a public bus at a bus stop across 
from Wisma Bakrie, on Jl. Rasuna Said, South Jakarta. The thin young man — with 
his long hair and blackened teeth and lips, a guitar and a harmonica — sang a 
1980s ballad of social criticism popularized by the legendary Indonesian 
singer, Iwan Fals.

Thus, along the street with office blocks and very high-class facilities, the 
passengers enjoyed a fine performance with a perceptible contrast, since the 
song itself is about disharmony and the destruction of natural and ancestral 
legacies in Ujung Aspal village, Pondok Gede, East Jakarta. Iwan Fals called 
the phenomenon “keserakahan kota” (the greed of a city). 

Our point here, however, is that with his entertaining shows the busker might 
be able to make good money from bus to bus while thousands of other beggars do 
the same or different things. He possibly cheers us up, yet, at the same time, 
prompts us to reflect that they are victims of the greed of the city. 

Beforehand, on the same bus, a new notice is seen everywhere, “Don’t give 
charity to beggars!” At Gambir Train Station, several meters from a similar 
notice, many were giving alms to beggars or homeless drifters. 

A month later, at the presidential palace, on Idul Fitri, Sept. 10, 2010 — 
following some fatal incidents while giving alms during Ramadhan — a blind man 
died while he was queuing up to get a Rp 100,000 (US$11.7)in an Open House 
ceremony.

Despite the apology or “special” treatment given in the name of the President 
to the man and his family subsequently, the socio-economic relationship between 
them remains the same: Between gusti (the lord) and his kawula (the serf). 
Therefore, the “meeting with the president moment” became a public humiliation 
for the poor, an exploitation of a religious event and a way of nurturing the 
beggar mentality. 

In 1960, Naguib Mahfouz, an Egyptian Nobel laureate in literature, published 
his novel Midaq Alley (1960) and told us about Zaita, the cripple maker who 
lives outside the bakery and aids Dr. Booshy in his theft of false teeth. 
Although he could make money for himself, Zaita enables the disadvantaged to 
beg everywhere 
with their intentionally disfigured bodies.

Zaita is therefore “a hero” among the poor. He helps them to survive through a 
short cut since they cannot see any other available means of subsistence.

These examples then fit several points. First, the beggar mentality is actually 
preserved structurally by even the highest social or political strata of 
society. While the real beggars actualize it through begging for a little 
money, despite their capabilities to do something else, the charity givers make 
use of it through some forms of humiliating displays of charity. 

Second, the availability of traditional reference values also upholds the 
beggar mentality in society. Certain religious teachings, for instance, have 
allegedly disseminated fatalism, a belief in how one’s life has been 
predestined. 

Alongside this, alms givers think they are merely performing rituals through 
their charity and therefore are absolved of any blame for doing something 
counterproductive. 

In spite of these allegedly misunderstood religious teachings, the values exist 
and are practiced (Abdurrahman Wahid, 1991). 

We can also find traditional legitimacy for the beggar mentality in the life of 
homeless drifters such as in Javanese concepts: satrio lelono, bocah angon and 
etcetera (Onghokham, 1991). Through art performances or helping people, begging 
seems to be a socially legitimate way of life. 

Even in the Indonesian revolution in 1948, there were guerilla groups calling 
themselves Laskar Kere (group of the poor) or Laskar Pengemis (group of the 
beggars). 

Finally, the beggar mentality remains a long-lasting problem for the state. The 
state’s lip-service policies for the disadvantaged have only impoverished 
larger segments of the society. Instead of guaranteeing prosperity for the 
people, they lay fertile soil for the germination of a beggar mentality. 

Back to our question of whether the Jakarta government will succeed or not in 
eradicating begging, two things must at least be considered. First, besides 
using an iron-fist in the short term, there should be massive campaigns to 
restore self-dignity to everybody in the long term, especially to those who 
could potentially become beggars by themselves or be recruited by the 
syndicates. 

Formal education, for example, should guarantee students’ self-reliance. 
Religious or traditional figures should emphasize the importance of working 
hard to their followers — more than just an edict prohibiting begging. 

State leaders or politicians should stop exploiting for their own interest 
charity that actually deepens people’s social problems. 

Second, we should strengthen social charity bodies, not only by giving our alms 
to the recognized and authorized ones with appropriate programs, but also to 
monitor their activities. Providing life-skills and proper jobs for the poor, 
for example, is much better than feeding them directly with money or food. 

Happy Lebaran!

The writer is a researcher at Paramadina Foundation Jakarta.

Related News >> 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke