** ...YANG ANEHNYA " TERORISME " DEWASA KINI SANGAT DI- FOKUS-KAN se-mata2
DAN SANGAT DITEKANKAN hanya pada KEGIATAN DAN atau ACT TERROR dan TINDAK
KEKERASAN yang dilakukan oleh suatu GROUP atau ORGANISASI ILLEGAL atau
yang dianggap ILLEGAL SE-MATA2....
** DALAM KENYATAANNYA DAN DARI APA YANG KITA LIHAT DAN ALAMI didalam
KEHIDUPAN POLITIK DUNIA INI - sejak katakanlah PERANG DUNIA I -
melalui PERANG DUNIA II - disusul dengan " PERANG DINGIN yg teramat
PANAS " .. sampai dewasa kini ..... , TIDAK SEDIKIT KITA MENYAKSIKAN
" TINDAKAN KEKERASAN DAN BAHKAN KEKEJAMAN YG MUTLAK " YANG DILAKUKAN
OLEH APARATUR2 NEGARA ( " Aparatur dan
Lembaga2 LEGAL " DAN BAHKAN LANGSUNG OLEH NEGARA DAN OLEH PEMETRINTAH
YG LEGAL ATAU YG DIANGGAP LEGAL ....
( Contohnya ..? : BANYAK dan Tidak sedikit - Cukup bagi setiap dari
Kita untuk membuka dan membaca kembali SEJARAH DUNIA .....)
KESIMPULAN : 1) Jika Kita bicara tentang " TERRORISME " .
.MAKA KITAPUN HARUS SANGGUP MENERIMA KENYTAAN DAN BICARA TENTANG
" TERROR NEGARA " -
Jadi bukan dan tidak saja hanya TERORISME NYA organisasi Ilegal atau yg
dianggap Ilegal - seperti misalnya
Group AL´Q´AIDA, dan
semacamnya ... (bahkan Tamil Freedom Organisation dan IRA pun dianggap
oleh Sementara Negara2 yg
berkepentingan sebagai
Suatu Oraganisasi Terorist " ......, Mungkin juga dijaman ORBAnya Soeharto
- FRETELIN pun diangap sbg
Organisasi Terrorist ..
..PADAHAL JEN.SOEHARTO MENGGUNAKAN KEKUASAAN NEGARANYA bersama dengan
KEKUATAN
GOLONGAN LAINNYA
-TELAH MELAKUKAN KEKERASAN TERROR BERDARAH dengan Korban Jutaan Manusia ,
Tindakan terror mana
beberapa kali -
diluanginya . Peristiwa MEI 1989 (maaf jika saya keliru tahunnya) DAN
TERROR NEGARA berdarah lainnya ( Peristiwa
Tanjung Priok , ....dan
bhakan terakhir ini TINDAKAN KEKERASN SADITIS telah dilakukan terhadap
PENDUDK SIPIL IRIANJAYA oleh
KESATUAN2 COMBAT TNI ..
.. dll). Oleh karenanya Katagori Terrorisme - Tidak hanya bisa dipakai untuk
Organisasi2 atau Group2 Illegal
yang dianggap Terorist
dan atau yg merlakuakn Terror ( Misalnya : Terakhir ini adalah Kasus
Pembunuhan BENASIR BUTHO !!) -
MELAINKAN dan Terutaa
JUSTRU LEBIH KEJAM , LEBIH LUAS DAN ŚERING LEBIH BIADAB LAGI YG DILAKUKAN
OLEH "NEGARA "
( Contoh segar diabad
ini : GENOSIDE di BOSNIA-HERZEGOWINA, RUWANDI-BURUNDI , DI BURMA ...dll,
2) TERROR NEGARA yg
dilakukan oleh sementara Negara terhadap Bangsanya sendiri - dan atau TERROR
NEGARA oleh SEMENTARA
NEGARA BESAR terhadap
MASYARKAT BANGSA ATAU KEKUASAN LEGAL NEGARA LAINNYA ( Terutama Negara2 dan
Pemerintah
Resmi/Legal dari
sementara Negara Berkembang lainnya yg sering menjadi KORBAN TERROR NEGARA
LAIN - (misalnya :Coup d´Etat
yang dirancang dari
Luar dan dilaksanakan dng Kerja sama yg ketat anatar Kekauatan asing dng
Gerakan Subversive / atau Gerakan Ilegal
lainnya ...) dengan
Dalih POLITIS ( tidakjarang pula idioloigis) DAN DENGAN BACKGROUND YANG
PALING DASAR : " EKONOMI "....
( Kongkretnya:
PENGUASAAN Expoitasi Minyak dan Bahan2 Energy dan Bahan Dasar lainnya .....
dan dng sendirinya sekali gus untuk
Menguasai Pasaran
dalam negri Negara2 terkait bagi Pasaran Barang2 exportnya serta dalam
rangka menghadapi Konkurensi dari Produkt
Export dan Kapital
dari Negara2 Saingannya .... )
Dikatakan bahwa : Uang bisa merubah Charakter Manusia ...... ( TAMBAHAN: ..
demikian pula dng "Interest Ekonomi " , bisa merubah CHARAKTER POLITIK DAN
PEMERINTAHAN SUATU NEGARA ...., Marc.- )
Contra factum non datur argumentum ( Against THE TRUTH - No more Argument
is needed )
-------Original Message-------
From: Barisan Merahputih
Date: 22.9.2011 14:40:05
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [GELORA45] Struggle against International terrorism
Satu kesatuan Definisi mengenai Terorisme tidakpernah ada, dan takkan pernah
ada.
Setiap Negara mempunyai kepentingan masing-masing, dan setiapnya mempergukan
istilah
"Terorisme" dan "Teroris" sesuai dengan kepentingan kekuasaan Negara
masing-masing.
Nikolai Patrushev - head of Russian Security Council , mempromosi istilah
melawan terorisme seperti melawan drug trafficking and illegal immigration"
Apakah ini termasuk kategori Terorisme? Disangsikan!
Ini adalah bagian Kriminal Ekonomi.
International terrorism 'principal threat' to Russia
Russian Security Council head Nikolai Patrushev described these threats as
non-traditional," in contrast to military threats, stressing they were
taking center stage and could not be countered by states single handedly
© RIA Novosti. Andrey Stenin
13:39 22/09/2011
YEKATERINBURG, September 22 (RIA Novosti
International terrorism, as well as drug trafficking and illegal immigration
poses the greatest threat to Russia, the country's top security official
said on Thursday.
Russian Security Council head Nikolai Patrushev described these threats as
non-traditional," in contrast to military threats, stressing they were
taking center stage and could not be countered by states single handedly.
"These problems recognize no borders, so states are currently not in a
position to ensure their security without cooperation," he said.
The Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) and the Shanghai
Cooperation Organization (SCO) provide an effective format for such
cooperation, Patrushev said.
Center 2011 military exercises to kick off in CSTO member states
Russian servicemen are dispatched to Kazakhstan to take part in military
exercises
© Photo The press service of the Central Military District
06:53 19/09/2011
MOSCOW, September 19 (RIA Novosti)
The Center 2011 strategic military exercises of the Collective Security
Treaty Organization (CSTO) member states are starting on Monday in Russia,
Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, the Russian Defense Ministry reported
The drills will be the key indicator of the Russian armed forces' military
training level as part of an ongoing military reform. They will involve 12
000 servicemen, 100 tanks, 50 aircraft and ten warships.
The active phase of the drills will last until September 26, the ministry
said. The exercises will be summed up on September 27 at the Chebarkul
proving ground in the Urals.
The wargame will be held under the leadership of Russian General Staff Chief
Army Gen. Nikolai Makarov at seven proving grounds of the CSTO member states
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev will supervise the event.
The CSTO is a regional security organization. Its seven member states are
Russia, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.
The Shanghai Cooperation Organization in the war on terror
Read more on: SCO, China, Terrorism
10:29 10/06/2011
© Pavel Gerasimov, RIA Novosti
BEI Wenli
When the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) was set up, the Shanghai
convention on countering terrorism, separatism and extremism was
incorporated into the documents signed jointly by the six heads of state.
The Shanghai Cooperation Organization is primarily viewed as a local or
regional security organization, with its main goal being to combat these
three forces through its framework of military cooperation. Therefore it can
be said that when this organization was born, its core task was to fight and
eventually win a resounding victory over terrorism, separatism and extremism
Within the SCO, this counter-terror function serves to enhance mutual trust
among the member countries in political and military terms: promoting
cooperation among the countries. There is much to be gained from a genuine
improvement in the foundations of peace and friendship, from countering real
security threats, eliminating the hidden danger to regional security, and
from coming together to fight international terrorism. It involves forming a
framework for cooperation on different aspects of the fight against
international crime, guaranteeing international information security,
ensuring member countries’ defense capabilities are maintained at a level
able to counter external threats, and enforcing the SCO’s ability to act.
All this then boosts its international reputation, creates a new security
concept and establishes a model for cooperation on security issues that
allows all parties involved to cope with the unpredictable international
situation.
The organization has existed for 10 years, in terms of SCO anti-terror
activities and security cooperation, not only has it been gradually
expanding throughout its existence, its standards are raised daily. Issues
on its agenda range from solving the traditional security threat to tackling
non-traditional threats; from setting up a legal basis for security
cooperation to cooperation among the member states’ law enforcement agencies
responsible for security; from the holding of joint anti-terrorism military
exercises to setting up local anti-terror organizations. The territory
covered by counter-terror activities has seen some of the most active and
efficient cooperative work in the SCO. This framework has provided strong
support for cooperation in politics, economics as well as in the humanities.
China is fully cognizant of the fact that it has a real interest in building
the “harmonious area,” in fostering counter-terror cooperation within the
SCO framework. It also represents a very real guarantee that the long-term
friendly cooperative clauses agreed by SCO member countries will be realized
and concrete methods found to tackle the main security challenges China
faces. Cooperating with other SCO member countries in the fight against
terrorism is beneficial in solving military and security-related issues and
also to eliminate the obstacles in the economic and social spheres. China is
actively pushing for greater anti-terrorism cooperation. On the theoretical
side, China proposed a new safety concept and is on record as saying it has
moved beyond the concept of unipolar security and is instead working toward
mutual security through mutually beneficial cooperation. It is seeking to
eliminate the breeding grounds for terrorism through boosting these areas’
economic development. In practical terms, China has been an active
participant in organizing bilateral and multilateral anti-terrorism
exercises. Furthermore, China has held large forums and seminars as well as
symposiums on anti-terrorism, to assist in training military officers and
police staff in Central Asian countries.
Nowadays, disputes over hot issues come and go like the ebb and flow of the
tides. Hot issues remain to be solved in some SCO member states’ regions,
while the traditional and non-traditional security threats have fused.
Therefore, peace building will remain a complex issue requiring significant
work in the long-term, bound up with the multi-faceted security challenges.
Against this backdrop, it is especially important that anti-terrorism
cooperation is continuously enforced and deepened within the framework of
the SCO. A Chinese Defense Ministry spokesman recently said that although
the killing of bin Laden is an important event and represents active
progress in the international war on terror, terrorist activities are still
quite frequent, and the international situation remains, in this respect,
quite tough. The international community should work to reinforce
cooperation among nations and fight terrorism together. He emphasized that
cooperation on security issues accounts for one of the major elements of
overall SCO cooperation. He added that the Chinese side is ready and willing
to facilitate continued development in this direction, working in
cooperation with other member countries on defense and security issues in an
atmosphere of mutual trust and mutual benefit, acting together with the
member countries to combat the “three forces” (terrorism, separatism,
extremism) and cope with the ability to counter other new threats and new
challenges that may arise, in so doing, creating a peaceful and stable
external environment that will benefit member countries and their people
alike. Anti-terror measures will be a key agenda item at the summit meeting
of heads of state marking the SCO’s tenth anniversary, on 15 June. This
shows that the SCO is highly alert in this area.
Enhancing and deepening the anti-terrorism cooperation within the SCO
framework is a meaningful task. The future will see other tough tasks emerge
One that is actively considered and which has seen attempts to realize it
involves improving overall performance. This necessitates developing a
uniform understanding, improving the mechanism, optimizing the entire
process and boosting ability. For instance, one Chinese scholar proposed
setting up a regular united military mechanism to improve the
“anti-terrorism mechanism” and to construct 6+N SCO anti-terrorism
partnership mechanism. This would provide the framework for handling a
variety of issues from extradition to terrorism, separatism and extremism.
This involves establishing a rule on extradition in terror cases of
“prosecution not extradition.” This would approximate the inclusion of human
rights protection in the anti-terror convention. In addition, the member
countries have different concepts of: defense ability, state security
strategy, the legal system and the nature of security cooperation as well as
certain disputes in which they differ in the details. This deserves
consideration, and an investigation of what practices should be used if
these differences are to be overcome in such a way that benefits joint
anti-terrorism cooperation.
Professor Bei Wenli is the Deputy Head of Russian Research Center, East
China Normal University, China, Shanghai.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
