http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/NA20Ae01.html

Jan 20, 2012 


Fewer zeroes for Indonesia
By Megawati Wijaya 


Fewer zeroes for Indonesia
By Megawati Wijaya 

JAKARTA - Draft legislation to redenominate Indonesia's currency is expected to 
gain momentum this year as lawmakers and monetary authorities push to drop the 
last three zeros from the nominal value of the rupiah. While the paper change 
will be largely cosmetic, analysts are divided on whether a redenomination 
could spark inflation and sow confusion among the public. 

The rupiah currently trades at 9,200 to the US dollar and is the second-lowest 
priced currency in the world, trailing only the Vietnamese dong. The rupiah 
collapsed amid the 1997-1998 Asian financial crisis and despite economic and 
financial recovery still trades at a fraction of its pre-crisis value. 

Finance Minister Agus Martowardojo said last month that the government was 
prepared to submit the draft law to the House of Representatives (DPR) for 
approval. The central bank, Bank Indonesia, has backed the move for various 
reasons, including the need to simplify accounting standards for transactions 
that now often exceed trillions of rupiah to the national pride that will be 
supposedly restored through a lower nominal currency value. 

If the bill is passed, as is expected, Bank Indonesia has said it will need one 
to two years to introduce the concept to the public and explain how to adapt 
accounting and information systems. During the proposed transition period, 
prices of goods would be labelled with both the old and new rupiah rates. Old 
notes would later be recalled and replaced by new notes where one rupiah would 
be equivalent to 1,000 of the old bills, according to the proposed plan. 

Certain financial analysts wonder if redenomination could be used to mask a 
devaluation of the currency to improve export competitiveness. If so, the 
policy motivation isn't abundantly apparent: Indonesian gross domestic product 
(GDP) grew by 6.5% last year, up from 6.1% in 2010. That represented the 
fastest growth clip seen since 1996, the year before the Asian financial crisis 
hit and bankrupted the national coffers. GDP growth is projected to hit 6.3% 
this year. 

In December, Fitch Ratings was the first of the three major credit agencies to 
raise Indonesia's sovereign rating from junk status to BBB minus, based on the 
country's steady economic growth, low debt and strong macroeconomic position. 
The upgrade represented the first time Indonesia has achieved investment grade 
status since the economy collapsed during the 1997-98 financial crisis. 

Moody's followed suit this week, raising Indonesia's rating from debt to 
investment grade. The credit rating agency said Indonesia's cyclical resilience 
to large external shocks pointed to sustainably high trend growth over the 
medium term. 

"A more favorable assessment of Indonesia's economic strength is underpinned by 
gains in investment spending, improved prospects for infrastructure development 
following key policy reforms, and a well-managed financial system," Moody's 
said in a public statement. 

Fundamental strengths
The rupiah was relatively stable against the US dollar during last year, a 
troubling economic and financial period around the world, with the local unit 
trading between 8,500-9,000 to the greenback. 

That stability would seem to indicate that the proposed redenomination plan is 
not being driven by urgent economic problems, as has been the case in the past. 
Inflation was a manageable 3.79% in December, marking a 20-month low, although 
there are indications that exports are slowing amid economic turbulence in 
Europe and the United States and slowing growth in China. 

Bank Indonesia deputy governor Budi Rochadi has acknowledged that a 
redenomination of the rupiah would be "disastrous" if the transition was 
attempted during a period of high inflation. He has said that three 
requirements must be met to redenominate successfully, namely a stable economic 
environment, low inflation and a government guarantee of price stability. He 
has said that all three conditions are currently and securely in place. 

Mika Martumpal, a currency analyst at Commonwealth Bank based in Jakarta, 
believes that the redenomination plan carries few economic risks. 

"It's not an overnight change. Bank Indonesia has planned to have a transition 
period that may run for years in which both currencies - existing rupiah and 
new rupiah - are accepted as legal tender. Consequently, the public will have 
time to accept the new currency," he said. 

Martumpal notes that Turkey dropped five zeroes from the lira and had two 
currencies in circulation for four years before dropping the word "new" from 
the replacement currency in 2009. Turkey has often been cited as a success in 
using redenomination to fight inflation and simplify economic transactions that 
were previously denominated in terms of billions, trillions and even 
quadrillions, Martumpal notes. 

The key to avoiding a sudden currency devaluation during redenomination is 
public education, according to Johannes Ginting, a market analyst at Monex 
Investindo Futures. "Preparing the public to accept the new rupiah will take 
time. During the transition period, prices of goods have to be clearly marked 
with two currencies to ensure that psychologically people will understand that 
the value of their money has not dropped," he said. 

Traumatic past 
Managing those perceptions, however, may be easier said than done. An older 
generation of Indonesians remembers having the value of their savings 
drastically reduced through currency redenomination schemes implemented in 
1950, 1956 and 1966. The first, in 1950, saw then finance minister Syarifuddin 
Prawiranegara order the public to literally tear in half all of the notes they 
held denominated over five rupiah. 

The left portion of a torn bill was valid as legal tender but worth only half 
the pre-torn bill's original amount. The right portion of the torn unit was no 
longer valid but could be exchanged for government bonds - valued far less than 
the money's original face value. 

The policy aimed to reduce public purchasing power, counter hyperinflation and 
pay off then-spiraling national debt. While the policy's success in dampening 
inflation was temporary, the move managed to drastically reduce the quantity of 
money in circulation and replaced the bills issued by the colonial Dutch 
administration. 
In 1959, Indonesia again sought to reduce the amount of money in circulation 
and contain hyperinflation. A presidential decree acted to drop one zero off 
all 500 and 1,000 rupiah notes, an unexpected move announced on the radio that 
effectively reduced the value of the currency by 90% overnight. Those 
ham-fisted interventions collapsed the value of the rupiah, which fell from 45 
to the US dollar in 1955 to 35,000 by 1965. 

An even more radical change took place in 1965 to curb inflation that then ran 
as high as 650% Then president and independence hero Sukarno, whose central 
bank over-printed bank notes to finance political prestige projects, ordered 
the public to exchange their old 1,000 rupiah notes for new one rupiah notes. 
The move drove prices even higher as Indonesians ditched cash for gold, goods 
and other assets. 

Indonesia is now in better technocratic hands, but policymakers still feel 
obliged to play down that economic history. The proposed redenomination plan, 
Bank Indonesia officials have emphasized, is wholly different from the schemes 
of the past. Central bank governor Darmin Nasution has repeatedly said that the 
purchasing power of the rupiah will remain the same, despite dropping three 
zeroes from its nominal value. 

Still some local analysts and business leaders suspect a hidden agenda and have 
referred to lingering "trauma" among older Indonesians when discussing the 
potential downsides of the redenomination plan. 

"This has been done back in the president Sukarno era," said Sofyan Wanandi, 
general chairman of the Indonesian Business Association (Apindo), in a recent 
interview. "However it was not fruitful. Instead society endured trauma." 

Megawati Wijaya is a Singapore-based journalist. She may be contacted at 
[email protected]. 

(Copyright 2012 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please 
contact us about sales, syndication and republishing

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke