Ref : TV Jepang tentang demonstration di berbagai kota di Tiongkok : 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fi3kjKKOQD4&feature=plcp


http://blogs.aljazeera.com/blog/asia/chinas-neighbourly-love-hate-relations
China's neighbourly love-hate relations
 
Marga Ortigas
Marga Ortigas, based in the Philippines, has been a broadcast journalist for 
more than 20 years. 
September 17, 2012 - 00:33

 Chinese protesters stage an anti-Japan rally outside the Japanese embassy in 
Beijing [Getty] 
China, the largest and most powerful country in the region – both economically 
and militarily - has recently been likened to a greedy octopus stretching its 
multiple arms out to grasp everything it can.

To the east – the Diaoyu/Senkaku/Tiaoyutai islands, depending on which 
nationalist nomenclature one might ascribe to. Farther south - the Spratlys and 
the Paracels.

All of them - uninhabited but sitting in abundant fishing ground, on important 
international trade routes and potentially rich in gas and oil reserves.

They have been at the centre of centuries-old conflicting territorial claims 
that are now coming to a head. For years, China’s geographic dispute with her 
neighbours spluttered along fairly innocuously.

Sure, there were sporadic incidents of relatively “mild” aggression on the high 
seas – but the neighbours’ economic interdependence meant they eventually died 
down and a status quo of quiet non-resolution was maintained.

But this time, Japan, the Philippines and Vietnam have been making more noise 
about territorial claims than they did before. Regional analysts attribute the 
shift to the more involved presence of the US.

The US has been bannering its military “pivot” towards the Asia-Pacific – and 
this is seen to be “emboldening” its allies. According to political analyst 
Andrew Leung, China’s neighbours might depend on China economically but they 
don’t want to be under her shadow, and the increased US attention offers a 
“free ride” under the superpower’s military umbrella - Which is not to say 
anyone is out for war.

"Even if a war was not directly with any one of them, an armed conflict on 
their doorstep would affect their economic growth and job," Leung explained.

But more than just diplomatic wrangling, the overlapping territorial claims 
have stoked nationalist fervour across claimant states and resulted in trade 
repercussions. Boycotts of each other’s products and travel bans have been 
called for. There have been "anti-China" rallies in Japan, the Philippines and 
Vietnam – as there have been "anti-all-the-other-countries" demonstrations in 
China.

In the last few days, after Japan announced it was purchasing disputed islands 
from a private owner, thousands have come out across China spewing their anger 
at anything related to Japan.

>From the embassy in Beijing, to restaurants, shops and any other 
>establishments that might be related to the "evildoer". That is how Japan was 
>referred to on a Chinese ruling party website that also made a point of 
>telling citizens that their "raging" patriotism might be counter-productive.

All in all, this was seen by many as a mixed message. That, and the fact that 
protesters managed to demonstrate loudly - all without being immediately 
stopped by Chinese police, have been taken by more than a few them as a silent 
mandate from their government. This is despite official pronouncements that 
China wants a peaceful resolution.

While the man-on-the-street fervour could be used as a less aggressive (that 
is, “not war”) means to illustrate each countries claim – the governments 
themselves are in a bind. Both China and Japan face leadership transitions – 
and could benefit from the nationally unifying role these international 
disputes are playing domestically.

At the same time, people are calling for their governments to be more “firm” in 
their territorial claims, and the current top officials are not likely to want 
to go out with a blow to their pride or their legacy.

So it goes back to a balancing act: domestic stability and international 
cooperation. But domestic stability also relies heavily on economics – and at 
the heart of the region’s symbiotic development sits China. For Japan, in 
particular, the largest trading partner.

China itself though cannot do with isolating itself from its neighbours, 
particularly not with the US now intent on playing a more vital role in the 
area.

Andrew Leung boils it down to a need to redefine regional reality. This time 
around, it may no longer do to maintain the status quo of quiet non-resolution.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke