http://english.pravda.ru/business/finance/19-11-2012/122851-joint_eurasian_currency-0/

USSR to rise from ashes through joint Eurasian currency
19.11.2012 
The creation of the supranational currency within the scope of the Customs 
Union is inevitable, Prime Minister of Armenia, Tigran Sargsyan, believes. 
According to him, this should be the next stage of integration within the 
organization, which makes sense from the point of view of simplification of 
currency circulation in transfers. The new currency may see the light on 
January 1, 2015.

As the prime minister of Armenia said during the meeting with members of the 
Club of Editors of the CIS, Baltic countries and Georgia, it would be 
advantageous for three member states of the Customs Union to have a 
supranational currency. "This is beneficial both to economic entities and 
citizens. What's the point in having a national currency and losing money 
during transfers?" said Sargsyan.

The Armenian Prime Minister also said that Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan are 
now at about the same level of development, "and no country is going to live at 
the expense of another." According to Sargsyan, five years of coordinated 
monetary and fiscal policy will be enough for everyone to realize the need for 
a single currency. However, for representatives of the Russian side this 
question is important already today.  The active discussion of the issue began 
in the summer of 2012.

"In the summer of this year, Russian Prime Minister Medvedev called for the 
creation of a single currency for Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan. He repeated a 
similar idea at the recent CIS forum in Yalta - Alexander Razuvayev, Ph.D. and 
Director Analytical Department of Alpari said in an interview with Pravda.Ru. - 
In principle, it may seem that the idea looks a little strange against the 
background of the crisis in the euro zone and the probability that not only 
Greece, but perhaps Spain may leave the euro zone, but there is a grain of 
common sense here, because money decides a lot in today's world. Only a single 
currency may actually unite the single economic space."

Originally, the main challenge to the single currency of the Customs Union was 
the fact that the idea was presented by the Russian government from the 
dominant position. That is, Russia offered the CIS countries to join the ruble 
zone, while Moscow would retain the right to control the money-printing 
process, and other countries would automatically fall into dependence on the 
Russian Central Bank and the Finance Ministry. Needless to say that this 
approach left Belarus and Kazakhstan dissatisfied. As a result, everyone 
started to pull the blanket over in this matter.

"Some would say that Belarus has planned economy, some would say that there are 
problems in Kazakhstan. However, we must realize that Russia's economy is much 
larger than that of Kazakhstan, and especially of Belarus. One shouldn't forget 
that Russia has world's third largest international reserves, more than 500 
billion dollars, and Russia's GDP this year is about 2 trillion. Accordingly, 
given the positive macroeconomic situation in Russia, this includes the growth 
of more than 4 percent, and the budget surplus, so to form a currency area like 
that would be easy enough, taking into consideration the fact that there is 
political will for that on the part of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan. As for 
Belarus, the idea was very popular 10 years ago, but during that time Mr. 
Lukashenko wanted to have the emission center.  Well, of course, neither the 
Russian Finance Ministry nor the Russian Central Bank could accept that," says 
Alexander Razuvayev.

Another major problem of the Customs Union was Ukraine's reluctance to join it. 
Experts say that the full integration within the Customs Union and the Eurasian 
Economic Community is impossible without the participation of Ukraine. However, 
it was reported at the end of last week that Ukraine's Ministry of Foreign 
Affairs reiterated the impossibility of joining the Customs Union, as the 
country sets the course for European integration. The reasonable arguments 
saying that the Russian market was much more advantageous for Ukraine than the 
Ukrainian was for Russia, have not brought any results.

Surprisingly, though, the free trade idea between the CIS countries and Russia 
inspired the Crimean Republic, the first president of which, Yuri Meshkov, 
unexpectedly expressed his intention to join the Customs Union regardless of 
the Ukraine. Moscow does not hope much for the influence of the Crimea, 
although it may ring another "bell" for Ukraine's Yanukovych. Experts tend to 
see the "hand of the Kremlin" here, rather than an independent decision made by 
the head of the autonomous territory. However, it is no secret that Russia can 
make Ukraine join the union through the use of more abrupt, manipulative 
measures.

"In today's world, only 200-250-million-strong markets can be self-sufficient. 
Kazakhstan and Russia, plus Belarus is somewhat less. And, accordingly, the 
system can work only if Ukraine is integrated. One shouldn't forget that Russia 
can put pressure on Ukraine through energy carriers," says Alexander Razuvayev.

To date, Russia has taken a detached attitude to Ukraine. Ukrainian officials 
say that there could be a possibility for the country to join the Customs Union 
in the event the economic situation in the euro zone worsens. For the time 
being, Ukraine is standing at a crossroads, wondering which union to join.

"Either way, it is believed that the new currency will appear on 1 January 
2015, although possibly earlier. Political sovereignty can hardly be 
questioned. It is unlikely that it will be the Russian ruble. Most likely, it 
will be a new Eurasian currency, and, consequently, we will have a new Eurasian 
Central Bank. Of course, it will be a local currency, because the size of 
combined economies is still a lot smaller than the economy of the United 
States, China, or the European Union. However, it will really mark the actual 
denunciation of Belovezha Accords and restoration of the Soviet Union, albeit 
in a new version 2.0 and on absolutely new market and capitalist principles," 
the expert concluded.

Maria Snytkova

Pravda.Ru


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke