res. Riwayat hidup Gen. Giap bisa dibaca pada : 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vo_Nguyen_Giap#Early_life

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/05/world/asia/gen-vo-nguyen-giap-dies.html?ref=asia&_r=0&pagewanted=all

Gen. Vo Nguyen Giap, Who Ousted U.S. From Vietnam, Is Dead
  a..  
  Hoang Dinh Nam/Agence France-Presse — Getty Imagesa..  
  Agence France-Presse — Getty Imagesa..  
  Agence France-Presse — Getty Imagesa..  
  Romeo Gacad/Agence France-Presse — Getty Imagesa..  
  Julian Abram Wainwright/European Pressphoto Agency
Gen. Vo Nguyen Giap, left, with Robert S. McNamara, the former defense 
secretary, in Hanoi in 1995.
By JOSEPH R. GREGORY
Published: October 4, 2013 
  a.. 
Vo Nguyen Giap, the relentless and charismatic North Vietnamese general whose 
campaigns drove both  France and the United States out of Vietnam, died on 
Friday in Hanoi. He was believed to be 102. 


The death was reported by several Vietnamese news organizations, including the 
respected Tuoi Tre Online, which said he died in an army hospital. 

General Giap was among the last survivors of a generation of Communist 
revolutionaries who in the postwar decades freed Vietnam of colonial rule and 
fought a superpower to a stalemate. In his later years, he was a living 
reminder of a war that was mostly old history to the Vietnamese, many of whom 
were born after it had ended. 

But he had not faded away. He was regarded as an elder statesman whose 
hard-line views had softened with the cessation of the war that unified 
Vietnam. He supported economic reform and closer relations with the United 
States while publicly warning of the spread of Chinese influence and the 
environmental costs of industrialization. 

To his American adversaries, however, from the early 1960s to the mid-1970s, he 
was perhaps second only to his mentor, Ho Chi Minh, as the face of an 
implacable enemy, as ruthless with his own forces as he was with his opponents. 
To historians, his willingness to sustain staggering losses against superior 
American firepower was a large reason the war dragged on as long as it did, 
costing more than 2.5 million lives — 58,000 of them American — sapping the 
United States treasury and Washington’s political will to fight and bitterly 
dividing the country in an argument about America’s role in the world that 
still echoes today. 

A teacher and journalist with no formal military training, Vo Nguyen Giap 
(pronounced vo nwin ZHAP) joined a ragtag Communist insurgency in the 1940s and 
built it into a highly disciplined force that through 30 years of revolution 
and civil war ended an empire and united a nation. 

He was charming and volatile, an erudite military historian and an intense 
nationalist who used his personal magnetism to motivate his troops and fire 
their devotion to their country. His admirers put him in the company of 
MacArthur, Rommel and other great military leaders of the 20th century. 

But his critics said that his victories had been rooted in a profligate 
disregard for the lives of his soldiers. Gen. William C. Westmoreland, who 
commanded American forces in Vietnam from 1964 until 1968, said, “Any American 
commander who took the same vast losses as General Giap would not have lasted 
three weeks.” 

General Giap understood something that his adversaries did not, however. Early 
on, he learned that the loyalty of Vietnam’s peasants was more crucial than 
controlling the land on which they lived. Like Ho Chi Minh, he believed 
devoutly that the Vietnamese would be willing to bear any burden to free their 
land from foreign armies. 

He knew something else as well, and profited from it: that waging war in the 
television age depended as much on propaganda as it did on success in the 
field. 

These lessons were driven home during the Tet offensive of 1968, when North 
Vietnamese regulars and Viet Cong guerrillas attacked scores of military 
targets and provincial capitals throughout South Vietnam, only to be thrown 
back with staggering losses. General Giap had expected the offensive to set off 
uprisings and show the Vietnamese that the Americans were vulnerable. 

Militarily, it was a failure. But the offensive came as opposition to the war 
was growing in the United States, and the televised savagery of the fighting 
fueled another wave of protests. President Lyndon B. Johnson, who had been 
contemplating retirement months before Tet, decided not to seek re-election, 
and with the election of Richard M. Nixon in November, the long withdrawal of 
American forces began. 

General Giap had studied the military teachings of Mao Zedong, who wrote that 
political indoctrination, terrorism and sustained guerrilla warfare were 
prerequisites for a successful revolution. Using this strategy, General Giap 
defeated the French Army’s elite and its vaunted Foreign Legion at Dien Bien 
Phu in May 1954, forcing France from Indochina and earning him the grudging 
admiration of the French. 

“He learned from his mistakes and did not repeat them,” Gen. Marcel Bigeard, 
who as a young colonel of French paratroops surrendered at Dien Bien Phu, told 
Peter G. Macdonald, one of General Giap’s biographers. But “to Giap,” he said, 
“a man’s life was nothing.” 

Hanoi’s casualty estimates are unreliable, so the cost of General Giap’s 
victories will probably never be known. About 94,000 French troops died in the 
war to keep Vietnam, and the struggle for independence killed, by conservative 
estimates, about 300,000 Vietnamese fighters. In the American war, about 2.5 
million North and South Vietnamese died out of a total population of 32 
million. America lost about 58,000 service members. 

“Every minute, hundreds of thousands of people die on this earth,” General Giap 
is said to have remarked after the war with France. “The life or death of a 
hundred, a thousand, tens of thousands of human beings, even our compatriots, 
means little.” 

Vo Nguyen Giap was born on Aug. 25, 1911 (some sources say 1912), in the 
village of An Xa in Quang Binh Province, the southernmost part of what would 
later be North Vietnam. His father, Vo Quang Nghiem, was an educated farmer and 
a fervent nationalist who, like his father before him, encouraged his children 
to resist the French. 

Mr. Giap earned a degree in law and political economics in 1937 and then taught 
history at the Thanh Long School, a private institution for privileged 
Vietnamese in Hanoi, where he was known for the intensity of his lectures on 
the French Revolution. He also studied Lenin and Marx and was particularly 
impressed by Mao’s theories on combining political and military strategy to win 
a revolution. 

In 1941, Ho Chi Minh, the founder of the Vietnamese Communist Party, chose Mr. 
Giap to lead the Viet Minh, the military wing of the Vietnam Independence 
League. 

In late 1953, the French established a stronghold in the northwest at Dien Bien 
Phu, near the border with Laos, garrisoned by 13,000 Vietnamese and North 
African colonial troops as well as the French Army’s top troops and its elite 
Foreign Legion. 

After an eight-week siege by Communist forces, the last French outposts were 
overrun on May 7, 1954. The timing was a political masterstroke, coming on the 
very day that negotiators met in Geneva to discuss a settlement. Faced with the 
failure of their strategy, French negotiators gave up and agreed to withdraw. 
The country split into a Communist-ruled north and a non-Communist south. 

In the late 1950s and early ’60s, President Dwight D. Eisenhower and later 
President John F. Kennedy looked on with rising anxiety as Communist forces 
stepped up their guerrilla war. By the time Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas 
in 1963, the United States had more than 16,000 troops in South Vietnam. 

General Westmoreland relied on superior weaponry to wage a war of attrition, in 
which he measured success by the number of enemy dead. Though the Communists 
lost in any comparative “body count” of casualties, General Giap was quick to 
see that the indiscriminate bombing and massed firepower of the Americans 
caused heavy civilian casualties and alienated many Vietnamese from the 
government the Americans supported. 

With the war in stalemate and Americans becoming less tolerant of accepting 
casualties, General Giap told a European interviewer, South Vietnam “is for the 
Americans a bottomless pit.” 

On Jan. 30, 1968, during a cease-fire in honor of the Vietnamese New Year 
(called Tet Nguyen Dan), more than 80,000 North Vietnamese and Viet Cong troops 
hit military bases and cities throughout South Vietnam in what would be called 
the Tet offensive. For the Communists, things went wrong from the start. Some 
Viet Cong units attacked prematurely, without the backing of regular troops as 
planned. Suicide squads, like one that penetrated the United States Embassy in 
Saigon, inflicted some casualties and caused much damage, but were quickly 
wiped out. 

Despite some successes — the North Vietnamese entered the city of Hue and held 
it for three weeks — the offensive was a military disaster. The hoped-for 
uprisings never took place, and some 40,000 Communist fighters were killed or 
wounded. The Viet Cong never regained the strength it had before Tet. 

But the fierceness of the assault illustrated Hanoi’s determination to win the 
war and shook the American public and leadership. 

“The Tet offensive had been directed primarily at the people of South Vietnam,” 
General Giap said later, “but as it turned out, it affected the people of the 
United States more. Until Tet, they thought they could win the war, but now 
they knew that they could not.” 

He told the journalist Stanley Karnow in 1990, “We wanted to show the Americans 
that we were not exhausted, that we could attack their arsenals, 
communications, elite units, even their headquarters, the brains behind the 
war.” 

He added, “We wanted to project the war into the homes of America’s families, 
because we knew that most of them had nothing against us.” 

The United States government began peace talks in Paris in May 1968. The next 
year, Nixon began withdrawing American troops under his policy of 
Vietnamization, which called for the South Vietnamese troops to bear the brunt 
of the fighting. 

In March 1972, the North Vietnamese carried out the Easter Offensive on three 
fronts, expanding their holdings in Cambodia and Laos and bringing temporary 
gains in South Vietnam. But it ended in defeat, and General Giap again bore the 
brunt of criticism for the heavy losses. In summer 1972, he was replaced by 
Gen. Van Tien Dung, possibly because he had fallen from favor but possibly 
because, as was rumored, he had Hodgkin’s disease. 

Although he was removed from direct command in 1973, General Giap remained 
minister of defense, overseeing North Vietnam’s final victory over South 
Vietnam and the United States when Saigon, the South’s capital, fell on April 
30, 1975. He also guided the invasion of Cambodia in January 1979, which ousted 
the brutal Communist Khmer Rouge. The next month, after Hanoi had established a 
new government in Phnom Penh, Chinese troops attacked along the North 
Vietnamese border to drive home the point that China remained the paramount 
regional power. 

It was General Giap’s last military campaign. He was removed as minister of 
defense in 1980 after his chief rivals, Le Duan and Le Duc Tho, eased him out 
of the Politburo. Too prominent to be openly denounced, he was instead made 
vice prime minister for science and education. 

But his days of real power were gone. In August 1991, he was ousted, along with 
other top officials, after Vo Van Kiet, a Western-style reformer, came to 
power. 

In his final years, General Giap was an avuncular host to foreign visitors to 
his villa in Hanoi, where he read extensively in Western literature, enjoyed 
Beethoven and Liszt and became a convert to pursuing socialism through 
free-market reforms. His thinking had shifted. 

“In the past, our greatest challenge was the invasion of our nation by 
foreigners,” he told an interviewer. “Now that Vietnam is independent and 
united, we can address our biggest challenge. That challenge is poverty and 
economic backwardness.” 

Addressing that challenge had long been deferred, he told the journalist Neil 
Sheehan in 1989. “Our country is like an ill person who has suffered for a long 
time,” he said. “The countries around us made a lot of progress. We were at 
war.” 


Seth Mydans contributed reporting. 

Kirim email ke