http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MID-03-111213.html
  Dec 11, '13


SPEAKING FREELY

Why the Jews left their Arab lands
By David Bensoussan

Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers 
to have their say. Please click here if you are interested in 
contributing.


There has been a Jewish presence in Arab-Muslim countries since well 
before Islam was introduced and it dates back to before the 6th century 
before the current era. These communities have disappeared or are in the 
process of disappearing in the majority of Arab-Muslim countries. In fact, 
865,000 Jews found themselves excluded in the very countries they were 
born in and felt that they had to leave. [1,2]

The traditional legal status of non-Muslims in Muslim countries
Non-Muslim minorities in Muslim countries have the status of dhimmi, which 
means "tolerated" or "protected". This flows from the assertion that 
Jewish and Christian scripture was distorted by their unworthy 
depositories. It is legislated under the Pact of Umar which was amended 
several times with the addition of other discriminatory measures.

A dhimmi is in an inferior position within Muslim society: they have 
special taxes, wear recognizable clothing, are the subject of humiliating 
measures, and do not have legal status when they are involved in a legal 
matter involving Muslims. Shi'ite Islam considers Jews to be a source of 
impurity. While the conditions of Jews have differed between countries, 
some features overlap for Jews in Morocco, and in the Ottoman and Persian 
Empires.

In the 19th century, several travellers, consuls and educators, sent out 
by the Alliance Israelite Universelle, sent back alarming reports on the 
situation of Jews, including the following: daily humiliation, objects of 
scorn, submissive to the point of atrophy, constant insecurity, 
abductions, densely populated Jewish quarters, dramatic impoverishment and 
seriously unsanitary living conditions. They described nightmarish 
fanaticism on the one hand and resignation on the other.

The difficult circumstances of Jews, who made up 0.5% to 3% of the 
population, depending on the country, was also raised by Muslim 
chroniclers. Jews automatically became the scapegoats whenever there was 
political instability, a military defeat or difficult economic conditions, 
as well as drought. Massacres and plundering happened on a regular basis. 
[3]

Generally speaking, the rulers were benevolent to a certain degree - of 
course there were exceptions - and their decisions were not always applied 
accordingly.

For example, the decree agreed to in 1864 by the Moroccan ruler and the 
philanthropist, Moses Montefiore, on the cessation of mistreatment of 
Jews, never actually changed anything.

Jews were accused of ritual murder in Damascus in 1840 and in Cairo in 
1902. In the Ottoman Empire, there were reforms that ended the mandatory 
wearing of distinctive clothing and the special tax on non-Muslims, but 
once again, in the more remote areas of the Empire, this was never 
enforced.

The precolonial and colonial period

Being on the fringes of the 19th century expansion of Europe, many Jews 
sought consular protection, and the parameters were set down at 
international conferences in Tangier, Madrid, Lausanne, and so on. 
Algerian Jews obtained the right to French nationality in 1870, Tunisian 
Jews obtained it at their request in 1923 and Moroccan Jews maintained 
their status of dhimmi when Morocco became a protectorate.

A large number of Jews acquired Egyptian nationality but this was quietly 
withdrawn in 1940 which left about a quarter of Jews without a 
nationality. In Yemen, Sharia law was applied in 1948 and Jewish orphans 
were taken in order to be converted to Islam, a practice that had been in 
use since 1922.

It should be pointed out that improved legal status for Jews did not 
always translate into improved lives, because mentalities do not evolve as 
quickly as one might hope. Overall, the Westernization of Jews in 
countries where the majority is Muslim preceded that of Muslims by more 
than one generation because of, among other reasons, the reach of the 
school network of the Alliance Israelite Universelle.

Under the colonial regime, Jews were finally able to live outside the 
Jewish quarter, the mellah or hara, and they no longer had to wear 
distinctive clothing. Many Muslims saw this as changing the Jewish status 
that they felt had been carved in stone by Islamic law. The tradition of 
prosecuting Jews during difficult domestic times, as well as the 
resentment against colonial power and the emancipation of Jews, were all 
key factors in triggering anti-Jewish actions, as happened in Fez in 1912, 
in Cairo in 1945, and so on.

In order to avoid antagonizing the Muslim majority and even the 
anti-Semitic European colonists, the colonial authorities often turned a 
blind eye to the abuse of Jews, for example in Baghdad in 1941. No doubt 
Jews were considering leaving their country if they could not achieve 
equal rights. During the Second World War, a pro-Nazi regime came to power 
in Iraq and the sweeping pogrom, the Farhoud, was carried out in 1941. The 
Mufti in Jerusalem was the self-appointed voice of Nazi propaganda and he 
encouraged Bosnia Muslims to join the Waffen SS. As well, Jews in Libya 
were sent to death camps in Europe and a number in Jews in Tunisia were 
made to do forced labor.

After the Second World War

After the war, there was growing insecurity in eastern Jewish communities. 
There had been a pogrom in Libya in 1945, anti-British and anti-Semitic 
riots within the same year in Egypt, in Syria, Yemen and Aden in 1947, and 
Jews were excluded from the Syrian and Lebanese administrations in 1947. 
The political committee of the Arab League, made up of seven countries, 
proposed in 1947, well before Israel's independence, that the assets of 
Jews be frozen. [4]

Israel's independence and their surprise victory over invading Arab armies 
was a miracle in the eyes of Jews. Pressure was put on Jews who were told 
to prove their loyalty by opposing the Jewish state and the Arab press was 
full of invective against Israel and Jews. People left in a panic for 
Israel from several countries despite threats to destroy the newly formed 
state.

There were multiple anti-Jewish measures: non-renewal of professional 
licenses in Iraq, a prohibition on leaving Iraq in 1948 and Yemen in 1949, 
the withdrawal of Egyptian nationality from Jews, who then became 
stateless in the 1950s, and the withdrawal of the right to vote for Jews 
in Libya in 1951.

Add to that the pogroms in Djerada, in Morocco in 1948, in Damascus and 
Aleppo in 1948, in Benghazi and Tripoli in 1948, in Bahrain in 1949, in 
Egypt in 1952, and in Libya and Tunisia in 1967. There were arrests and 
expulsions in Egypt in 1956, economic strangulation by spoliation in Iraq 
in 1951, in Syria in 1949, in Libya in 1970, or by exclusion in Syria and 
Lebanon in 1947, in Libya in 1958, in Iran in 2000, or by allowing 
Egyptian business only in Egypt in 1961.

Jewish heritage was destroyed in Oran in 1961 and in Libya in 1969 and 
1978, there was police abuse and abductions of young girls with forced 
conversions in Morocco from 1961 to 1962, Jews were kidnapped in Lebanon 
in 1967, there were public hangings in Baghdad in 1969, anti-Semitic 
cliches were used in the Arab press, and campaigns were used to increase 
anti-Jewish sentiment and incite hatred, using Zionism as an excuse. After 
the Six-Day War, this rhetoric increased considerably.

Even though there were assurances of equality before the law in countries 
considered to be moderate, such as Morocco and Tunisia after their 
independence, membership in the Arab League meant a full boycott in terms 
of relations or contact with Israel. Mail was prohibited, it was difficult 
to get a passport, and any media that did not portray Israel extremely 
negatively was prohibited from reporting. This boycott absolutely 
prevented any dialogue that could have led to mutual understanding.

Discriminatory measures that were taken against Jews and the state of 
Israel led to the quasi-disappearance of Jews in these countries. No Arab 
state has taken responsibility for the fate of its Jewish citizens. We are 
witnessing nowadays preservation measures of Jewish patrimony and 
increased Israeli tourism in Morocco. On the other hand, former Iranian 
president Mahmud Ahmadinejad's rhetoric denies the holocaust and calls for 
the elimination of Israel and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan 
acts as if it wanted the state of Israel to become a dhimmi state.

In conclusion, modern times opened the door to the possibility of the 
dignity of citizenship for Jews, and prejudice compelled them to leave 
their place of birth. The end of commonplace Jewish servitude in 
Muslim-Arab countries was dramatic for the Muslim world, which is why Arab 
nationalism has made Palestine its focal point for mobilization. Zionism 
represents Jews who have reclaimed their dignity and defend themselves, in 
other words the antithesis of dhimmis.

One must consider, furthermore, that the measures taken against Jews 
varied from one country to another. Once they were promulgated, the 
measures taken to protect Jews were rarely applied. In addition, it did 
not take much to arouse the people's animosity toward Jews, regardless of 
these measures.

The policy of terror and exclusion led to ethnic cleansing without regard 
for rights or a possessions that were lost, confiscated or abandoned, or 
to discriminatory measures along with their vicious propaganda, which 
ultimately led to an exodus that was practically forced, and often people 
left very quietly.

These discriminatory measures came in different forms and varied depending 
on the country. If it had not been for the Arab media's anti-Israeli 
frenzy and the discriminatory measures against Jews, it is highly likely 
that some of them would have decided to stay in their country. The feeling 
of insecurity constantly hung over Jewish communities. Their departure 
became necessary for their survival, otherwise it was just a question of 
time before they would be taken hostage by the potential unrest, which 
they were sure they would fall victim to next.

Jews who had been present in Arab Muslim countries for a 1,000 years were 
squeezed out in the span of one generation, and they had to choose exile 
to other countries.

Notes:
1. House of Commons, Canada, November 2013
2. See here 3. Georges Bensoussan. Juifs en pays arabes - Le grand 
d'racinement 1850-1975, Tallandier 2012, ISBN 978-28473-48873 4. See here

Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers 
to have their say. Please click here if you are interested in 
contributing. Articles submitted for this section allow our readers to 
express their opinions and do not necessarily meet the same editorial 
standards of Asia Times Online's regular contributors.

Dr David Bensoussan is a professor in the Department of Electrical 
Engineering at the ecole de technologie superieure de l'Universite du 
Quebec and has served as President of the Communaute Sepharade Unifiee du 
Quebec.

(Copyright 2013 Dr David Bensouss)
--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
SPAMfighter has removed 1103 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan 
http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen

Kirim email ke