http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/opinion/thanks-pdi-p-jokowi-wins-despite-poor-campaign/
No Thanks to the PDI-P: Jokowi Wins Despite a Poor Campaign By Yohanes Sulaiman on 08:19 pm Jul 13, 2014 Category Commentary, Opinion Tags: 2014 Indonesia Presidential Election, PDI-P Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle Indonesian presidential candidate Joko "Jokowi" Widodo stands beside former Indonesian President Megawati Soekarnoputri and her daughter Puan Maharani. (Reuters Photo/Beawiharta) Despite an ineffectual campaign by Indonesia’s Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P), Jakarta Governor Joko Widodo won Indonesia’s presidential election, according to quick count results. Data from reputable survey centers such as SMRC (Saiful Mujani Research & Consulting) showed a 3 percent to 5 percent margin of victory for Jokowi, Widodo’s popular nickname. This apparently comfortable margin, however, does not reflect how tight the race was. Former military general Prabowo Subianto almost snatched victory from the jaws of defeat in a race that Jokowi was supposed to win easily. Six months ago, surveys showed he had four times more popular support than Prabowo. With intense campaigning, Prabowo managed to close the gap in opinion polls just before the election. Prabowo still has yet to concede defeat, relying on four (of 11) quick count results that show him leading. The General Election Commission (KPU) will announce the result on July 22. Before April’s legislative election, Jokowi had a commanding lead in opinion polls of around 30 percent. But he started his campaign with a severe disadvantage. The PDI-P selected him as the party’s candidate only very late in the legislative campaign period. The PDI-P did not prominently promote Jokowi in most of its campaign material. The party’s ads show either chairwoman and former Indonesian President Megawati Soekarnoputri or her daughter Puan Maharani. As a result Jokowi’s impact in the legislative election was minimal. When votes for the legislative election were finally tallied, the PDI-P’s share of votes was far below the high (and often unrealistic) expectations. Many commentators and even people in his own party started to blame Jokowi. They questioned whether the “Jokowi Effect” actually exists. Further compounding the problems, Jokowi had to wait until he received Megawati’s approval in mid-March before he could become the PDI-P’s presidential candidate. Much to his disadvantage, he could not respond to smear campaigns that began to swirl during the legislative election campaign. Worse, his waiting for Megawati’s approval provided his opponents with ammunition to cast doubt about his ability as a leader. Prabowo did not have Jokowi’s problem of trying to become the standard-bearer of his party. But he had two main challenges: his poor human rights record and his lag in the polls. Prabowo had to campaign aggressively. He built a huge coalition of several political parties. He expected the party machinery to turn out votes for him. Prabowo also counted on his coalition partners to attack Jokowi with a barrage of negative campaigns to create doubt in voters’ minds. Backed by media moguls and his billionaire brother, Hashim Djojohadikusumo, Prabowo had an effective campaign team that spread his message all over the place. The tactics worked, thanks to the ineffectual responses from Jokowi’s team. By the end of June, Prabowo was neck-and-neck with Jokowi in the polls. Several factors helped Jokowi salvage his campaign. First, and most importantly, Jokowi managed to attract a number of dedicated volunteers who were willing to spend their own money and work tirelessly to spread his messages to voters. The effect of those volunteers could hardly be overestimated. They organized a massive pro-Jokowi concert on the weekend before the election. The concert, which was held on the same day as the last presidential debate, managed to mobilize youth voters to support him. The second factor was the presidential debates. While the debates did little to influence undecided voters, the main purpose of the debate for the campaigns was to mobilize and energize the debate winner’s supporters. Here, Prabowo failed to use the debates to question Jokowi’s fitness as a leader and undermine the morale of Jokowi’s supporters. Instead, Prabowo appeared unprepared in the first debate. Meanwhile, Jokowi and his running mate, Jusuf Kalla, used the debates as a showcase of their program and can-do mentality. Prabowo and his running mate, Hatta Rajasa, performed well in the second and fourth debates. However, Jokowi and Kalla handily won the final debate. That momentum continued to election day. The third factor, which was beyond anyone’s control, was the fiasco of the polling in Hong Kong. Hundreds of Indonesia’s migrant workers were denied the right to vote after the polling station closed at 5 p.m. on Sunday. The General Election Commission (KPU) was accused of purposely preventing Jokowi’s supporters from casting their votes. While the details are still sketchy and in dispute, this created an impression among Jokowi’s supporters that Prabowo had managed to turn the system and the election commission against them. This incident galvanized Jokowi’s supporters and increased their turnout in Wednesday’s election. These three factors helped propel Jokowi’s recovery. He thus managed to stem his losses and prevail against Prabowo. It was a close call, though, and Jokowi won in spite of his party’s poor performance. Yohanes Sulaiman is a lecturer in international relations and political science at the Indonesian Defense University.
