Hi Ytai,

got one step further, so the program now runs. The checkout from the 
App-IOIO0400 
tag gave me the same problem, but checking out from trunk after your 1273 
commit, I got the bootloader working with the original app from the board. 
By examining the difference between the working and non-working hexfiles, I 
found that programming address 54E20  with the value 3C instead of 
unprogrammed, got everything working, haven't checked yet what it is, maybe 
USB clock calibration value.

But I have one big issue left, I am not able to debug using the Pickit 3. I 
can use it for small programs like the blinker, but if I try starting the 
bootloader, it fails during the chip programming (I know the trick, and 
have to use it, moving the highlight from the Pickit 3 serial number to the 
Pickit3 in the project properties !!!). If I use the 3 "Descrete Debugger 
Operation" steps instead of just "debug project", all three are successful, 
but there is no symbolic info/linenumbers loaded. Single stepping goes from 
address 0->2->0->2 endlessly. Clicking the "set PC at cursor" does not 
change the PC.

I suspect it has something to do with the protection mechanism you have 
made for avoiding overwriting the bootloader via IOIODude/IOIOManager.

So if you have any advice or hints to get debugging functioning, it will be 
greatly appreciated. I will probably end up having only the app, not the 
bootloader in the final program, but I am not that far yet.

Best regards,
Johny

Den tirsdag den 7. januar 2014 02.08.56 UTC+1 skrev Ytai:
>
> Your build process is correct, this is what I meant. Personally, I 
> normally just build all the libraries in all the configurations (there's an 
> option in the "Run" menu for batch build) and not have to worry about it, 
> or otherwise use tools/make-all to do that from command line. A later 
> version of make-all, which I haven't yet pushed even auto-generated the 
> makefiles from the project files, but otherwise you just need to build once 
> from MPLAB to get them generated.
>
> Anyway, if you're getting different hex files than I did, the options are:
>
>    - You're building from different sources. I propose you sync against 
>    github and use the tagged versions. For example, I built V4.00 of the 
>    firmware from the App-IOIO0400 tag, etc. By "sources" I also mean the 
>    project configurations, etc. 
>    - Your compiler is different in some way, for example, you're using a 
>    version that has optimizations disabled or something.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Johny Johansen 
> <[email protected]<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Ytai,
>>
>> thanks for the quick reply, and thanks for the great IOIO, have been 
>> flying with this a couple of years in my glider.
>>
>> Your suggestion is actually how I started, but it would not link.
>>
>> I have the sources in SVN, so just made a fresh checkout with the 
>> original sources, and compiled all libraries without problems. But when 
>> building device_bootloader, I get:
>> c:\programmer\microchip\mplab c30\bin\bin\..\bin/pic30-coff-ld.exe: 
>> cannot find -lusb
>>
>> The linker command has the following:
>> -l"usb",-L"../libusb/dist/PIC24FJ256GB206_CDC/production"
>>
>> but when examining the libusb project, its active configuration 
>> is PIC24FJ128DA106
>> So I don't see how I can build without changing this MPLAB project 
>> setting.
>>
>> Just to be sure, I downloaded the ioio-master.zip file once more, same 
>> result.
>>
>> Then tried setting the libusb active conf. to PIC24FJ256GB206_CDC, and 
>> rebuilding libusb and device_bootloader. Now it links OK.
>>
>> For the following projects, I also had to change the active 
>> configurations like this:
>> AppLayerV1: IOIO0030
>> libconn, libbtstack and libadb: PIC24FJ256GB206
>>
>> Recompiling these 3 libs and the AppLayerV1 now results in:
>> c:\programmer\microchip\mplab c30\bin\bin\..\bin/pic30-coff-ld.exe: 
>> cannot find -lusb
>>
>> Having this in the linker command:
>> -L"../libusb/dist/PIC24FJ256GB206_OTG/production"
>>
>> So it seems the bootloader and app requires two different libusb configs.
>> Is this correct?
>>
>> So changed the libusb conf. now to PIC24FJ256GB206_OTG, and rebuild 
>> libusb and AppLayerV1, which now succeeds.
>>
>> The sad thing: When comparing the two hexfiles produced this way, with 
>> the ones I have build previously, they are identical.
>>
>> Is it the starting point that is wrong, downloading the ioio-master.zip 
>> from the https://github.com/ytai/ioio
>> ?
>>
>> Sorry for the long mail.
>>
>> Regards, Johny
>>
>>>
>>>   -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "ioio-users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ioio-users.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ioio-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ioio-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to